期刊文献+

Chinese College Students' Abilities and Attitudes for Peer Review 被引量:1

中国大学生互读互评的能力和态度(英文)
原文传递
导出
摘要 This study investigated Chinese college students' ability to review their peer's essays and their attitudes towards peer review. I implemented a quasi-experiment on two College English classes for ten weeks. A triangulated analysis combining quantitative measures, qualitative analyses, and field notes showed that the experimental class had the capacity for commenting on peers' writing and demonstrated positive attitudes towards peer review. An independent sample t-test shows that the experimental group performed significantly better than the control groups in several aspects of English writing. On the completion of the experiment, students in the experimental group were also found to have more positive attitudes and higher motivation towards English writing. The findings suggest that as an effective collaborative activity, peer review should be widely employed in English writing instruction to enhance motivation, foster collaboration, and improve English writing. 本研究是对中国大学生英语写作中互读互评能力和态度的实验研究。两个自然班的61名学生参加了本实验。在过程式写作下,实验班系统地学习并开展了同学评议活动。数据分析采用了定量手段和定性分析相结合的方法。互评评语的定量分析、问卷调查、教师观察以及对学生作文的分析表明中国大学生具有互读互评的能力,互读互评有助于提高学生的写作能力,提升学生英语写作的动机和兴趣,促进协作式学习。本研究结果表明作为一项有效的协作式教学活动,互读互评应该在大学英语写作课堂上广泛使用。
作者 张洁
出处 《Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics》 2011年第4期47-58,127,128,共14页 中国应用语言学(英文)
关键词 College English EFL writing peer review 大学英语 英语写作 互读互评
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

二级参考文献39

  • 1Amores, M. J. A New Perspective on Peer-editing [ J ]. Foreign Language Annuals, 1997, 30(4) : 513 -23.
  • 2Liu, J. & J. G. Hansen, Peer response in second language writing classroom [ M]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2002.
  • 3Liu, J. & R. Sadler. The Effect and Affect of Peer Review in Electronic Versus Traditional Modes on L2 Writing [ J ]. Journal of English for Academic Purpose, 2003 (2) : 193 - 227.
  • 4Tsui, A. & Ng, M. Do Secondary L2 Writers Benefit from Peer Comments? [ J ]. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2000(1) : 217 -233.
  • 5Keh, C. L. Feedback in the Writing Process: a Model and Methods for Implementation [J]. ELT Journal, 1990(44) : 294 - 304.
  • 6Berg, E. C. The Effects of Trained Peer Response on ESL Students' Revision Types and Writing Quality [ J ]. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1999, 8 (3) : 215 - 241.
  • 7Paulus, T.M. The effort of Peer and Teacher Feedback on student writing [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1999, 8 (3) : 265 -289.
  • 8Levin, A. & B. Oded, et al. Variation in EFL - ESL Peer Response [ J ]. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, 2002 (3).
  • 9I_ockhart, C. & P. Ng. Analyzing Talk in Peer Response Group: Stances, Functions, and Content [ J ]. Language Learning, 1995(45) : 605 -655.
  • 10Nelson, G. L. & J. M. Murphy. An L2 Writing Group: Task and Social Dimensions [ J ]. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1992( 1 ).

共引文献986

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部