中国古代美学理论形态之本源说——读劳承万《中国古代美学(乐学)形态论》

China's Ancient Aesthetic Theories in Perspectives of Origin: Reading LAO Chengwan's China's Ancient Aesthetics(Gaietics)

中国没有西方意义上的美学,中国的美学应该是对应于中国心性哲学的"乐学",这是劳承万新著《中国古代美学(乐学)形态论》的核心观点。中西哲学形态的不同,注定了中西美学学科形态也是不同的,作者提出了梳理中国古代美学形态的三项式框架:"器物—考古证明—心性哲学之过滤升华",这是一大创见。他迥异于大陆学人的学术路子使得该著作的学术思路、方法和思考的问题给人耳目一新的感觉,该著作呈现出很多具有原创性和中国问题意识的理论新见,以及对整个20世纪以来中国美学研究的深刻反思。

China has no aesthetics in western ways, Chinese aesthetics should be gaietics, which is corresponding to Chinese mind-nature philosophy, this is the main point in professor LAO Chengwan＇s new work China＇s ancient aesthetics （Gaietics） . The different types of Chinese and western philosophy determine the differences between Chinese and western aesthetics. The book puts forward the frame （implements -archaeological proof -distillation of mind-nature philosophy） of studying Chinese ancient aesthetics, which is a kind of creative viewpoint. The authors academic way is so different from many researchers that makes the book has many original points.