期刊文献+

句子理解过程中词类加工的功能性质 被引量:2

The Functional Status of Syntactic Category Processing in Sentence Comprehension
下载PDF
导出
摘要 句法优先理论假设词类加工功能上优先于语义、动词论元结构和话语信息加工。来自德语和法语的证据显示,词类违反阻断语义整合和动词论元结构加工,因而词类优先于语义和动词论元结构。关于词类加工在功能上是否优先于话语信息加工,尚无来自任何语言的证据。汉语证据尽管显示词类并不优先于语义,但未充分讨论任务因素的影响。将来研究有必要使用ERP技术和违反范式,从语义整合、动词论元结构加工和话语水平加工等多个层面,同时操纵词类的正确性和非句法因素,考察句法特性上与德语和法语不同的语言,如汉语和韩语。这方面研究将有助于洞察一个语言的语言学特性如何制约或调整词类加工的功能性质。 Syntax-first theories assume that the processing of syntactic category (SC) is functionally prior to that of lexical semantics, verb argument structure, and discourse information. Previous event-related brain potential (ERP) studies in German and French have demonstrated that SC violations block both semantic and argument structure processing and thus SC has a functional primacy over the other two processes. It is still unknown whether there is also a functional primacy of SC over discourse processing, for any language. Although previous studies in Chinese revealed no functional primacy of SC over semantics, they didn't thoroughly address the possible influence of experimental tasks on the findings. Further studies need to investigate the functional status of SC relative to a variety of non-syntactic information such as lexical semantics, verb argument structure, as well as discourse information, in languages that differ from German and French in terms of syntactic properties, such as Chinese and Korean. In addition, these studies should record ERPs in the violation paradigm in which non-syntactic factors and the correctness of SC are manipulated simultaneously, as done in previous studies.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2011年第12期1741-1748,共8页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(31070898) 韩国学中央研究院基金项目(Academy of Korean Studies Grant AKS-2011-R-36)资助
关键词 句法 语义 动词论元结构 话语语境 汉语 syntax semantics verb argument structure discourse context Chinese
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1Altmann, G., & Steedman, M. (1988). Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition, 30, 191-238.
  • 2Boland, J. E. (1997). The relationship between syntactic and semantic processes in sentence comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 423-484.
  • 3Ferreira, F., & Clifton, C., Jr. (1986). The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 348-368.
  • 4Frazier, L. (1987). Sentence processing: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), The psychology of reading (pp. 559-586). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • 5Frazier, L., & Fodor, J. D. (1978). The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition, 6,291-325.
  • 6Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 178-210.
  • 7Friederici, A. D. (2002). Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 78-84.
  • 8Friederici, A. D., Gunter, T. C., Hahne, A., & Mauth, K. (2004). The relative timing of syntactic and semantic processes in sentence comprehension. NeuroReport, 15, 165-169.
  • 9Friederici, A. D., Steinhauer, K., & Frish, S. (1999). Lexical integration: Sequential effects of syntactic and semantic information. Memory & Cognition, 27, 438-453.
  • 10Friederici, A. D., & Weissenborn, Y. (2007), Mapping sentence form onto meaning: The syntax-semantic interface. Brain Research, 1146, 50-58.

同被引文献67

  • 1赵晶晶,牟书,舒华,王春茂.基于Morlet小波变换的EEG时频分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2006,23(1):56-59. 被引量:11
  • 2张亚旭,蒋晓鸣,黄永静.言语工作记忆、句子理解与句法依存关系加工[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(1):22-28. 被引量:15
  • 3王琳,张清芳,杨玉芳.EEG相干分析在语言理解研究中的应用[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(6):865-871. 被引量:5
  • 4Anguera, J. A., Boccanfuso, J., Rintoul, J. L., A1-Hashimi, O., Faraji, F., Janowich, J Gazzaley, A. (2013). Video game training enhances cognitive control in older adults. Nature, 501, 97-101.
  • 5Bastiaansen, M., & Hagoort, P. (2003). Event-induced theta responses as a window on the dynamics of memory. Cortex, 39, 967-992.
  • 6Bastiaansen, M., & Hagoort, P. (2006). Oscillatory brain dynamics during language comprehension. In W. Klimesch & C. Neuper (Eds.), Event-related dynamics of brain oscillations (Vol. 159, pp. 182-196). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • 7Bastiaansen, M., Mazaheri, A., & Jensen, O. (2012). Beyond ERPs: Oscillatory neuronal dynamics. In S. J. Luck & E. S. Kappenman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of event-related potential components (pp. 31-50). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • 8Bastiaansen, M., Magyari, L., & Hagoort, P. (2010). Syntactic unification operations are reflected in oscillatory dynamics during on-line sentence comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1333-1347.
  • 9Bastiaansen, M., Van Berkum, J. J., & Hagoort, P. (2002). Syntactic processing modulates the theta rhythm of the human EEG. Neuroimage, 17, 1479-1492.
  • 10Bastiaansen, M., Van der Linden, M., ter Keurs, M., Dijkstra, T., & Hagoort, P. (2005). Theta responses are involved in lexico-semantic retrieval during language processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 530-541.

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部