期刊文献+

行为决策中的忽略偏差:心理机制与影响因素 被引量:6

The Psychological Mechanism and Influential Factors of Omission Bias in Behavioral Decision Making
下载PDF
导出
摘要 忽略偏差是指在由忽略所导致的损失与由行为所导致的同等的或者更少的损失之间,个体更容易接受忽略所导致的损失。个体在日常行为决策的各种领域,特别是在公共政策制定中均会出现忽略偏差。目前忽略偏差的心理机制主要有损失规避和标准理论两种。忽略偏差的影响因素主要包括保护性价值观、选择结果的信息知悉度、负性情绪、社会角色和文化价值观念等。未来的研究则需要从忽略偏差的产生根源,与决策规避中其他偏差的关系,群体决策中忽略偏差的影响以及忽略偏差的应用研究领域,特别是公共管理与公共政策领域等方面进行深入的研究。 Omission bias described people's tendency to favor the loss caused by omission rather than the same or less loss caused by commission. This phenomenon is universal in people's daily decision-making behavior, especially in social public policy area. This paper introduces two psychological mechanism of the omission bias, namely, loss aversion and norm theory. Afterwards, we introduce influential factors of the omission bias, including protected value, the knowledge of outcomes, negative emotion, social roles and cultural values. Moreover, the deficiencies existing in current research are discussed and the directions for future research on omission bias are suggested.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2011年第12期1834-1841,共8页 Advances in Psychological Science
关键词 忽略偏差 损失规避 决策规避 保护性价值观 omission bias loss aversion decision avoidance protected value
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献138

  • 1沈厚才,徐进,庞湛.损失规避偏好下的定制件采购决策分析[J].管理科学学报,2004,7(6):37-45. 被引量:44
  • 2史金艳,李凯,郁培丽.考虑损失厌恶的最优消费投资决策[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2005,26(12):1196-1199. 被引量:5
  • 3Ariely, D., Huber, J., & Wertenbroch, K. (2005). When do losses loom larger than gains? Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 134-138.
  • 4Ariely, D., & Simonson, I. (2003). Buying, bidding, playing, or competing? Value assessment and decision dynamics in online auctions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13, 113-123.
  • 5Becker, G.M., DeGroot, M. H., & Marschak, J. (1964). Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral Science, 9, 226-232.
  • 6Brown, T. C. (2005). Loss aversion without the endowment effect, and other explanations for the WTA-WTP disparity. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 57, 367-379.
  • 7Carmon, Z., & Ariely, D. (2000). Focusing on the forgone: how value can appear so different to buyers and sellers. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 360-370.
  • 8Carrnon, Z., Wertenbroch, K., & Zeelenberg, M. (2003). Option attachment: when deliberating makes choosing feel like losing. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 15-29.
  • 9Chapman, G. B. (1998). Similarity and reluctance to trade. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 11, 47-58.
  • 10Chen, M. K., Lakshminarayanan, V., & Santos, L. R. (2006). How basic are behavioral biases? Evidence from capuchin monkey trading behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 114, 517-537.

共引文献218

同被引文献182

引证文献6

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部