期刊文献+

言者意向与含义取消性检验——后格赖斯语用学视角 被引量:3

On the Speaker Intention and Cancellability Test from the Perspective of Post-Gricean Pragmatics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 恰当处理言者意向和含义取消性检验的关系是在后格赖斯语用学理论背景下开展意义研究和语义学/语用学界面研究的基础。回顾经典格赖斯含义取消性检验的内涵,指出言者意向对含义取消性检验带来的挑战,提出言者意向参与构筑含义的表达不仅没有消解含义取消性检验的有效性,反而扩展了含义取消的标准,丰富了含义取消的维度和深化了语言交际的互动协商性。含义取消性检验的内涵由此得以充实,为进一步研究语义/语用界面相关意义层次的可取消性提供参照。 A proper elucidation of the relationship between speaker intention and cancellability test lays foundation for the study of meaning and semantics/pragmatics interface in post-Gricean era.This paper,after a review of the Gricean cancellability test,points out the challenges from speaker intention to ancellability test,and argues that the role of speaker intention in meaning construction does not falsify the cancellability of implicature,but expands cancellation criterion,broadens cancellation dimension and enhances communicative negotiation among participants.The Gricean cancellability test is therefore enriched to provide a guidance for further study of the cancellabilty of the meaning related to semantic/pragmatic interface.
作者 王晓飞
出处 《天津外国语大学学报》 2011年第6期16-22,共7页 Journal of Tianjin Foreign Studies University
基金 教育部人文社科基金项目(10YJA740064) 中央高校基本科研资助项目(ZYGX2009J128)
关键词 含义 意向 取消性检验 后格赖斯语用学 implicature speaker intention cancellability test post-Gricean pragmatics
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1孙玉.会话含义的可取消性再探[J].外国语,2010,33(3):52-59. 被引量:4
  • 2刘振聪,杨莉芳.言语行为理论批判:传承与嬗变[J].天津外国语学院学报,2006,13(2):25-31. 被引量:12
  • 3阮熙春.关联理论对预设可取消性的解释力[J].上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003,32(6):114-117. 被引量:2
  • 4Steffen Borge.Conversational Implicatures and Cancellability[J]. Acta Analytica . 2009 (2)
  • 5Capone,A.On Grice’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’s Circle:A Theory-internal Problem in Linguistic Theories of the Gricean Type. Journal of Pragmatics . 2006
  • 6Marcu,D,G.Hirst.A Uniform Treatment of Pragmatic Inferences in Simple and Complex Utterances and Sequences ofUttereances[OL]. http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/P/P95/P95-1020.pdf . 1995
  • 7Blome-Tillman,M.Conversational Implicature and the Cancellability Test. Analysis . 2008
  • 8Bottyan,G.The Operationality of Grice’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’s Tests for Implicature[OL]. http://www.nytud.hu/cescl/abs/abstract_bottyan.pdf . 2001
  • 9Capone,A.Are Explicatures Cancellable?Toward a Theory of the Speaker’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’s Intentionality. Intercultural Pragmatics . 2009
  • 10Sadock,J. M.On testing for conversational implicature. Pragmatics: A Reader . 1991

二级参考文献23

共引文献15

同被引文献26

  • 1张辉,蔡辉.认知语言学与关联理论的互补性[J].外国语,2005,28(3):14-21. 被引量:50
  • 2沈家煊.汉语里的名词和动词.汉藏语学报,2007,.
  • 3何奕娇.试论认知语言学与关联理论的互补性[J].外语学刊,2007(5):78-81. 被引量:11
  • 4Carston, R. Thoughts and Utterances : The Pragmatics of Explicit Com- munication [ M ]. Oxford : Blackwell,2002.
  • 5Carston, R. Explicit communication and ' free' pragmatic enrichment [ A ]. In Sofia, B. & E. Romero ( eds. ). Explicit Communication: Robyn Carston' s Pragmatics [ C ]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010: 217-287.
  • 6Carston, R. & Hall, A. Implicature and explicature[ A]. In H. J. Schmid (ed.). Cognitive Pragmatics [ C ]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mou- ton, 2012: 47-84.
  • 7Carston, R. Metaphor, ad hoc concepts and word meaning: More questions than answers[A]. In Hanks, P. & R. Giora(eds. ). Meta- phor and Figurative Language[ C]. London: Routledge, 2012: 338- 360.
  • 8Noveck, I. & D. Sperber. The why and how of experimental pragmat- ics: The case of " scalar inference" [ A ]. In Burton-Roberts, N. ( ed. ). Advances in Pragmatics [ C ]. Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmil- lan, 2007 : 184-212.
  • 9Recanati, F. Direct Reference: From Language to Thought[ M ]. Ox- ford: Blackwell, 1993.
  • 10Recanati, F. Literal Meaning[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部