摘要
僧肇在《不真空论》中对"本无"义的斥破,是历来注家聚讼不已的焦点。"本无"本是玄学家的概念,但在佛教徒那里它是梵文"Abhūtvā"一词的早期翻译。历史上道安、竺法深、竺法汰等都曾被单独拿来作为僧肇批评的靶子,但是僧肇的本义应该是对当时佛教界乃至玄学家执著于"无"的批评,其主张的"不真故空"的立场是对般若中观的正确理解。
Nonexistence is a Key words used by Xuan-Xue philosophers,but at early Chinese Buddhism it wsa used to translate the Sanskrit Abhūtvā.Sengzhao criticized the view of nonexistence in his thesis the Non-sunya Theory,but he did not clearly mentioned who he criticized,DAOAN,FACHEN,FATAI were considered the people Sengzhao criticized in history.In fact,Sengzhao criticized the whole Buddhism and Xuan-Xue philosophers who persisted nonexistence,and his view of "Non-sunya" is the right understanding of the Madhyamika.
出处
《信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2011年第6期48-52,共5页
Journal of Xinyang Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
本无
般若中观
不真空
非有
非无
nonexistence
Madhyamika
Non-sunya
non-being
non-nothing