期刊文献+

建立独立的兴奋剂纠纷处理程序机制的思考 被引量:4

Thinking of setting up independent doping disputes resolution procedure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 兴奋剂违纪行为有着与一般违纪行为不同的特征,因此对兴奋剂纠纷的处理也应该与一般违纪案件的处理程序不同。在我国有必要建立独立的兴奋剂纠纷处理程序,即在整体体育仲裁程序之下设立一个专门处理兴奋剂案件的分支程序,并在此程序中增加一系列刑事程序保障措施,包括确定以公正优先的价值导向、适用刑事证据规则、刑法的基本原则、增加对被追诉人利益的保障措施等。 As doping is different from general disciplinary acts,doping disputes should be dealt with differently from general disciplinary disputes.It is necessary to set up an independent doping disputes resolution procedure in China,which is a branch procedure under the sport arbitration procedure,and in which a series of criminal protection measures should be added including the establishment of the value orientation of priority of justice,application of the criminal evidence rules and the criminal fundamental principles and adding the protecting measures for the accused.
出处 《武汉体育学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第11期32-37,共6页 Journal of Wuhan Sports University
基金 国家社科基金项目(11cfx076)
关键词 兴奋剂案件 刑事程序 体育仲裁 doping case criminal procedure sport arbitration
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Matthew Hard. Caught in the Net: Athletes' Rights and the World Anti-Doping Agency [J ].Southern California Interdisci- plinary Law Journal ,2010(19) :555-586.
  • 2Transparency International - Czech Republic.Why Sport is not Immune to Corruption[EB/OLl. http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/epas/ Source/Ressources/EPAS_INFO Bures_en.pdf, 2008-12-01.
  • 3Matthew Hard Janwillem Soek. The Legal Nature of Doping Law [J]. The International Sports Law Journal, 2002(2):4-9.
  • 4Gabrielle Kaufman-Kohler, Antonio Rigozzi. Legal Opinion on the Conformity of Article 10.6 of the 2007 Draft World Anti-Doping Code with Fundamental Rights of Athletes [EB/ OL].http ://www.wada -ama.org/rtecontent/document/Legal_ Opinion_Conformity_10_6_complete_document.pdf, 2007 - 11 - 13.
  • 5CAS arbitration N CAS OG 00/289 [EB/OL]. http://jurispru- dence.tas -cas.org/sites/CaseLaw/Shared% 20Documents/289. pdf, 2011-02-24.
  • 6Cyclist Arrested in Austria [EB/OL]. http://sports.espn.go. com/oly/cycling/news/story ? id=4000571,2009-03-20.
  • 7Janwillem Soek.The Strict Liability Principle and the Human Rights of the Athlete in Doping Cases [EB/OL]. http://pub- lishing.eur.nl/ir/repub/asset/7548/DISS +INTEGRAL.pdf, 2011 - 04-20.
  • 8Richard H. McLaren. Twenty-five Years of the Court of Arbi- trations for Sport: A Look in the Rear-view Mirror [J]. Mar- quette Sports Law Review, 2010 (20) : 305 -325.
  • 9Antonio Rigozzi, Gabrielle Kaufmann-Kohler,Giorgio Malin- verni. Doping and Fundamental Rights of Athletes:Comments in the Wake the Adoption the World Anti-doping Code [EB! OL ].http ://www.lk -k.com/data/document/doping -and -funda- mental -rights -athletes -comments -the -wake -the -adoption - the-world-anti-do 1. pdf, 2011-04-25.
  • 10郭树理.建立中国体育仲裁制度的设想[J].法治论丛(上海大学法学院上海市政法管理干部学院学报),2004,19(1):61-66. 被引量:37

二级参考文献16

共引文献54

同被引文献45

  • 1郭树理,黄莹.美国反兴奋剂机构的仲裁制度[J].武汉体育学院学报,2007,41(1):6-9. 被引量:6
  • 2孙良国.从形式主义到实质主义——现代合同法方法论的演进[J].华东政法大学学报,2007,10(5):20-27. 被引量:5
  • 3Frederick F. Shauer. English Natural Justice and American Due Process:An Analytical Comparison[J]. William and Mary Law Review, 1976, (18) : 47-72.
  • 4Hilary A. Findlay. Alternative Dispute Resolution in Sports: Rules of a Sport-Specific Arbitration Process as an Instrument of Policy Making [J]. Marquette Sports Law Review, 2005, (16) :73-95.
  • 5Michael Lynk. Denning' s Revenge: Judicial Formalism and The Application of Procedural Fairness to Internal Union Hear- ings[J]. Queen's Law Journal, 1997, (23) : 115-171.
  • 6Curtis J. Berger and Vivian Berger. Academic I)iscipline: A Guide to Fair Process for the University Student[J]. Columbia Law Review, 1999, (99) :99-171.
  • 7Meacham v. A.E.E.U. , [1994] I.R.L.R. 218 at 225 (Q.B. D. ). Ian Smith, Christopher Osman.Harvey on Industrial Rela- tions and Employment Law [M]. London: Butterworths Law, 1991:2951.
  • 8Fellheimer v. Middlebury Coll [EB/OL]. http://vt.findacase. corn/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac. 19940824_ O000009.DVT.htm/qx, 2011-02-04.
  • 9Richard H. McLaren. Twenty-five Years of the Court of Arbi- trations for Sport: A Look in the Rear-view Mirror[J]. Mar- quette Sports Law Review,2010, (20) :305-325.
  • 10Michael S. Straubel. Doping Due Process: A Critique of theDoping Control Process in International Sport [J]. Dickinson Law Review,2002, (106) : 106-156.

引证文献4

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部