期刊文献+

基于功能危险分析的涡扇发动机数字控制系统危险识别方法研究 被引量:4

Research on Hazard Identification of Turbo-fan Engine Digital Control Systems Based on Functional Hazard Analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 将功能危险分析(FHA)方法应用到涡扇发动机全权限数字电子控制(FADEC)系统危险分析,对准确识别系统危险和提高多重失效分析效率的重点问题展开研究。针对由于结构复杂和功能层级较多导致的FADEC失效状态和影响的分析难度问题,提出了FHA功能定义及失效分析层级解决方案;针对多重失效状态数量的组合爆炸问题,提出组合劣化分析方法。在此基础上,针对FADEC发展了一套基于美国自动化工程学会(SAE)ARP-4761可操作的FHA分析方法,并在型号中进行了应用实践。结果表明,本文所提FHA方法能够明确分析出FADEC系统的危险失效状态,并有效减少多重失效分析工作量。 With the functional hazard analysis(FHA) approach applied to hazard identification of turbo-fan engine full authority digital electronic control(FADEC) system,the key problems of the system hazard identification and the multiple failure analysis efficiency are focused in this paper.A system function definition and accordingly a multi-layer failure analysis are proposed to remove the failure condition and effect analysis difficulties in FHA of FADEC system,due to the structural and functional complexity.A worse-combination filtering analysis skill is proposed to handle the quantity explosion problem in the multiple failure condition identification.Based on the basic principles of the Society of Automotive Engineers(SAE) ARP-4761 and all the above skills,a practicable hazard identification procedure is developed for the FHA implementation of FADEC systems and put into use in an industrial case.The results show that the proposed FHA procedure can help clearly identify the hazardous failure conditions of the FADEC system and effectively lower the task load in the multiple failure identification.
出处 《航空学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第12期2194-2203,共10页 Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica
基金 教育部长江学者和创新团队发展计划(IRT0905) 工业与信息化部领航创新基金项目(YWF-10-01-B23)~~
关键词 涡扇发动机 全权限数字电子控制系统 系统安全性分析 功能危险分析 失效分析 组合劣化分析 turbo-fan engine full authority digital electronic control system system safety analysis functional hazard analysis failure analysis worse-combination filtering analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Guidelines and methods for conducting the safety assess ment process on civil airborne systems and equipment. SAE ARP-4761 [S]. Warrendale: SAE International, 1996.
  • 2Hasson J, Crotty D. Boeing' s safety assessment processes for commercial airplane design [ C]// AIAA/IEEE 16th Digital Avionics Systems Conferenee. San Diego: IEEE, 1997 : 1-7.
  • 3Certification considerations for highly-integrated or corn plex aircraft systems. SAE ARP-4754 [S]. Warrendale: SAE International, 1996.
  • 4Jaw L C, Garg S. Propulsion control technology develop ment in the United States a historical perspective[R]. NASA/TM-2005-213978, 2005.
  • 5Code of federal regulations, part 33, AMDT 33-24[S]. Washington: FAA, 2007.
  • 6Code of federal regulations, part 33, AMDT 33-26[S]. Washington: FAA, 2008.
  • 7Straznicky P. Aerospace system design and safety[D]. Ottawa: Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engi- neering, Carleton University, 2002.
  • 8Allenby K, Kelly T. Deriving safety requirements using scenario[C] // Fifth IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering. USA: IEEE Computer Socie- ty Press, 2001: 228-235.
  • 9Wilkinson P J, Kelly T P. Functional hazard analysis for highly integrated aerospace systems[C]//IEEE Seminar on Certification of Ground/Air Systems. London: 1EEE, 1998:1-6.
  • 10Maragakis I, Clark S. Safety management system and safety culture working group: guidance on hazards identi fication[M]. Brussels: Euroeontrol, 2009:13-14.

共引文献6

同被引文献45

  • 1刘伟涛,顾鸿,李春洪.基于德尔菲法的专家评估方法[J].计算机工程,2011,37(S1):189-191. 被引量:185
  • 2孙有朝,刘建军,梁力,等.功能危险分析在民机安全性设计中的应用研究[C]//大型飞机关键技术高层论坛暨中国航空学会2007年学术年会论文集.深圳:中国航空学会,2007:1-7.
  • 3Flight Safety Foundation. Aviation Safety Network[ EB/OL]. aviation- safety, net, 2013 - 4 - 6.
  • 4民航安全科学研究所.世界民航事故数据库[EB/OL].http//www.air-safety.com.2013-4-6.
  • 5Zaal P M T, Pool D M,Postema F N, et al. Design and Certi- fication of a Fly- By- Wire System with Minimal Impact on the Original Flight Controls [ R ]. AIAA -2009 -5985,2009.
  • 6Zhang Lin, Ma Haiying, Deng Jianjun. Reliability Study of Disengaging Mechanism based on Fault Tree Analysis [ C ]. IEEE, Quality, Reliability, Risk, Maintenance, and safety En-gineering Conference ,2012:290 - 292.
  • 7Qiang Guo. Novel Approach to Risk Assessment of Aircraft Electrical Wiring Interconnect System [ J ]. Journal of Air- craft,2011,48:1888 - 1893.
  • 8Ewen Denney, Ganesh Pai, Corey Ippolitd, et al. An Interated Safety and Systems Engineering Methodology for Small Un- manned Aircraft Systems [ R ]. AIAA - 2012 - 2572,2012.
  • 9Mark S Saglimbene. Reliability Analysis Techniques:How They Relate To Aircraft Certification [ Z ]. IEEE, Reliability and Maintainability Symposium,2009:218 - 222.
  • 10Andrjia Volkanovski, Marko Cepin, Borut Mavko. Applicati- ion of the Fault Tree Analysis for Assessment of Power Sys- tem Reliability [ J ]. Reliability Engineering & System Safe- ty,2009,94(6) :1116 - 1127.

引证文献4

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部