期刊文献+

反事实思维研究的理论解释 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 反事实思维是指在心理上对过去事实的否定并建构一种原本可能会出现而实际没出现的设想性结果的思维活动。综合国内外许多学者的研究成果,在此探讨反事实思维的定义和五种理论:标准理论、目标指向说、两阶段模型理论、心理模型理论和功能理论。这些理论阐述了反事实思维的产生机制、影响因素,最后展望了反事实思维研究的未来趋势。
作者 胡利平
出处 《淮北职业技术学院学报》 2011年第6期43-44,共2页 Journal of Huaibei Vocational and Technical College
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Byrne, RMJ. The rational imagination: How people create alternatives to reality [M]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.
  • 2Kahneman D. Miller D T. Norm theory: Comparing reality to its internatives [ J ]. Psychological Review, 1986.
  • 3陈俊,贺晓玲,张积家.反事实思维两大理论:范例说和目标-指向说[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(3):416-422. 被引量:31
  • 4Roese N J. Counterfactual Thinking[J]. Jounal of personality and Social Psychology, 1997.
  • 5Medvec V, Savitsky K. When doing better means feeling worse: The effects of categorical cutoff points on counterfactual thinking and satisfaction[J]. Jour- nal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997.
  • 6Bymrne, RM. J. Mental models and counterfactu- althoughts about what might have been[J]. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2002 (10).
  • 7Kai Epstude and Neal J. Roese. The Function Theroy of Counteractural Thinking[J]. Personality and So- cial psychological Review, 2008 ( 12 ).

二级参考文献43

  • 1Landman J. Regret and elation following action and inaction: affective responses to positive versus negative outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1987, 13: 524-526.
  • 2Trabasso T, Bartolone J. Story understanding and counterfactual reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2003, 29(5): 904-923.
  • 3Davis C G, Leman D R., Wortman C B. et al. The undoing of traumatic life events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1995, 21: 109-124.
  • 4Zeelenberg M, van den Bos K, van Dijk E, et al. The inaction effect in the psychology of regret. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 2002, 82:314-327.
  • 5Roese N J, Olson J M. Self-esteem and counterfactual thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1993, 65:199-206.
  • 6Sanna L J, Turley K J. Antecedents to spontaneous counterfactual thinking: Effects of expectancy violation and outcome valence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1996, 22(9): 906-919.
  • 7Meyers-Levy J, Maheswaran D. When timing matters: The influence of temporal distance on consumers' affective and persuasive responses. Journal of Consumer Research, 1992, 19:424--433.
  • 8Medvec V H., Savitsky K. When doing better means feeling worse: The effects of categorical cutoff points on counterfactual thinking and satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997, 72(6): 1284-1296.
  • 9Medvec V H., Madey S F, Gilovich T, et al. When less is more: Counterfactual thinking and satisfaction among Olympic medallists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995, 69(4): 603-610.
  • 10Seelau E P, Seelau S M, Wells G, et al. Counterfactual constraints. Mahwah, N J, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 1995:57-79.

共引文献30

同被引文献9

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部