3Sumi T,Sumi M V,Cauteren M,et al.Parallel imaging technique for the external carotid artery and its branches comparison of balanced turbo field echo,phase contrast,and time-of-flight sequences angiog raphy using SENSE in multiple stations:feasibility study|J].J Magn Reson Imaging,2007,25(5):1 028-1 034.
4Du Y P,Parker D L,Davis W L,et al.Experimental and theoretical studies of vessel contrast-to noise ratio in intracranial time-of-flight MR angiography[J].J Magn Reson Imaging,1996,6 (1):99-108.
5Edelman R R,Wentz K U,Mattle H P,et al.Intracerebral arteriovenous malformations:evaluation with selective MR angiograpby and venography[J].Radiology,1989,17 (3):831-837.
6Bernstein M A,Huston J,Lin C,et al.High-resolution intracranial and cervical MRA at 3.0T:technical considerations and initial experience[J].Magn Reson Med,2001,46(5):955-962.
7Wansapura J P,Holland S K,Dunn R S,et al.NMR relaxation times at 3 Tesla[J].J Magn Reson Imaging,1999,9(4):531-538.
8Farb R I.The dural venous sinuses:normal intraluminal architecture defined in contrast-enhanced MR venography[J].Neuroradiology,2007,49 (9):727-732.
9Lovblad K O,Schneider J,Bassetti C,et al.Fast contrast-enhanced MR whole-brainvenography[J].Neuroradiology,2002,44 (8):681-688.
10Liang L,Korogi Y,Sugahara T,et al.Evaluation of the intracranial dural sinuses with a 3D contrast-enhanced MP-RAGE sequence:prospective comparison with 2D-TOF MR venography and digital subtraction angiography[J].Am J Neuroradiol,2001,22 (3):481-492.
2Ide S, Hirai T, Morioka M, et al. Usefulness of 3D DSA-MR fu- sion imaging in the pretreatment evaluation of brain arteriovenous malformations. AcadRadiol, 2012, 19(11):1345-1352.
3Friedlander RP. Arteriovenous malformations of the brain. N En gl J Med, 2007,356(26) :2704-2712.
4Willinsky R, Goyal M, Terbrugge K, et al. Embolisation of Small (<3 cm) Brain Arteriovenous Malformations. Correlation of Angiographie Results to a Proposed Angioarehiteeture Grading System. Interv Neuroradiol, 2001,7(1) : 19-27.
5Zacharia BE, Vaughan KA, Jacoby A, et al. Management of rup tured brain arteriovenous malformations. Curr Atheroscter Rep, 2012,14(4) :335 342.
7Piotin M, Gaillind PC. MRA and rotational DSA for volunetri assessment of intraeranial aneurysms. Neuroradiology, 2003, 45 (6) :404-409.
8Matsumoto M, Kodama N, Endo Y, et al. Dynamic 3D-CT an- giography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2007,28(2) :299-304.
9Mohr JP, Kejda-Scharler J, Pile-Spellman J. Diagnosis and treat- ment of arteriovenous malformations [J]. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep, 2013, 13(2): 324.
10Gross BA, Frerichs KU, Du R. Sensitivity of CT angiography, T2-weighted MRI, and magnetic resonance angiography in detect- ing cerebral arteriovenous malformations and associated aneurysms [J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2012, 19(8): 1093-1095.
