期刊文献+

Joint PP and PS AVO inversion based on Zoeppritz equations 被引量:2

Joint PP and PS AVO inversion based on Zoeppritz equations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Considering Zoeppritz equations, reflections of PP and PS are only the function of ratios of density and velocity. So the inversion results will be the same if the ratios are the same but values of density, velocities of P- wave and S-wave are different without strict constraint. This paper makes efforts to explore nonlinear simultaneous PP and PS inversion with expectation to reduce the ambiguity of AVO analysis by utilizing the redundancy of multi-component AVO measurements. Accurate estimation of ratio parameters depends on independence of input data. There are only two independent AVO attributes for PP reflectivity (i.e. intercept and gradient) and two for PS reflectivity (i.e. pseudo-intercept and pseudo-gradient or extreme amplitude), respectively. For individual PP and PS inversion, the values of least-squares objective function do not converge around a large neighborhood of chosen true model parameters. Fortunately for joint PP and PS inversion the values of the least-squares objective function show closed contours with single minima. Finally the power function fitting is used to provide a higher precision AVO attributes than traditional polynomial fitting. By using the four independent fitting attributes (two independent attributes for PP and PS respectively), the inversion of four ratio parameters (velocities and densities) would be estimated with less errors than that in traditional method. Considering Zoeppritz equations, reflections of PP and PS are only the function of ratios of density and velocity. So the inversion results will be the same if the ratios are the same but values of density, velocities of P- wave and S-wave are different without strict constraint. This paper makes efforts to explore nonlinear simultaneous PP and PS inversion with expectation to reduce the ambiguity of AVO analysis by utilizing the redundancy of multi-component AVO measurements. Accurate estimation of ratio parameters depends on independence of input data. There are only two independent AVO attributes for PP reflectivity (i.e. intercept and gradient) and two for PS reflectivity (i.e. pseudo-intercept and pseudo-gradient or extreme amplitude), respectively. For individual PP and PS inversion, the values of least-squares objective function do not converge around a large neighborhood of chosen true model parameters. Fortunately for joint PP and PS inversion the values of the least-squares objective function show closed contours with single minima. Finally the power function fitting is used to provide a higher precision AVO attributes than traditional polynomial fitting. By using the four independent fitting attributes (two independent attributes for PP and PS respectively), the inversion of four ratio parameters (velocities and densities) would be estimated with less errors than that in traditional method.
出处 《Earthquake Science》 CSCD 2011年第4期329-334,共6页 地震学报(英文版)
基金 funded by National 973 Basic Research Developments Program of China (No.2005CB422104) 863 National High Technique Research Development Project of China (No.2007AA060505) National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.40839901)
关键词 multi-components AVO simultaneous inversion multi-components AVO simultaneous inversion
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Chen T S and Wei X C (2007). Inversion of velocity ratio vp/vs from converted wave AVO. 76th Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys, Expanded Abstracts, 999- 1 002.
  • 2Debski W and Tarantola A (1995). Information on elastic parameters obtained from the amplitudes of reflected waves. Geophysics 60:1 426-1 436.
  • 3Drufuca G and Mazzotti A (1995). Ambiguities in AVO inversion of reflections from a gas-sand. Geophysicss 60: 134 -141.
  • 4Fatti J L, Smith G C, Vail P J, Strauss P J and Levitt P R (1994). Detection of gas in sandstone reservoirs using AVO analysis: A 3-D seismic case history using the Geostaek technique. Geophysics 59(6): 1 362-1 376.
  • 5Ferguson R J and Stewart R R (1996). Shear Wave Interval Velocity From P-S Stacking Velocities. CREWES Research Report, The University of Calgary, Vol. 8, Chapter 22, 1 -7.
  • 6Larsen J A (1999). AVO Inversion by Simultaneous P-P and P-S Inversion. [M.S. Dissertation]. Department of Geology and Geophysics, The University of Calgary, 28-35.
  • 7Lines L R (1998). Density Contrast is Difficult to Determine Front AVO. CREWES Research Report, The University of Calgary, Vol. 10, Chapter 47, 1- 8.
  • 8Miles D R and Gassaway G S (1989). Three-component AVO analysis. 59th Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Ezpl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 706 -708.
  • 9Ramos A B C and Castagna J P (2001). Useful approximations for converted-wave AVO. Geophysics 66(6): 1 721- 1 734.
  • 10Smith G C (1996). 3-parameter geostack. 66th Annual Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstract, 1 747 1 750.

同被引文献32

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部