经腹与经阴道超声诊断宫颈囊肿两种方法对比分析

目的:探讨经腹超声(transabdominal ultrasonographyTAS)与经阴道超声(transvaginal ultrasonography TVS)诊断宫颈囊肿的漏诊原因及临床意义。方法:选取2008年2月-2009年10月来我院妇科就诊及体检行TAS诊断的已婚妇女655例,2010年1月2010年12月来我院妇科就诊及体检行TVS诊断的已婚妇女479例,将两种检查方式对宫颈囊肿诊断结果进行对比分析。结果:TAS诊断宫颈囊肿诊断率14%,TVS诊断率56.9%;172例宫颈囊肿,TAS诊断率55.8%。TVS诊断率100%。结论:经腹超声诊断宫颈囊肿较经阴道超声有很大的漏诊率,经阴道超声诊断宫颈囊肿敏感性高,可作为检查宫颈囊肿的首选方法。

Objective： To evaluate abdominal ultrasonography （transabdominal ultrasonography TAS） and transvaginal ultrasound （transvaglnal ultrasonography TVS） missed diagnosis of cervical cyst causes and clinical significance. Methods： February 2008 to October -2009 gynecological clinic and hospital medical diagnosis TAS line 655 cases of married women, in Jariuary 2010 to December 2010 in our hospital gynecology clinic and medical diagnostic llne TVS married Women＇s 479 cases, the two types of inspection methods for he diagnosis of cervical cysts were analyzed. Results： TAS diagnosis of cervical cyst diagnosis rate 14%, TV5 diagnosis rate of 56.9% ; 172 cases of cervical cysts, TAS diagnostic rate of 55.8%. TV5 diagnosis rate of 100%. Conclusion： Abdominal ultrasound compared with transvaginal ultrasound cervical cysts have a great rate of misdiagnosis, transvaginal ultrasound diagnosis of cervical cysts high sensitivity, can be used as the preferred method of checking cervical cyst.