摘要
目的:观察异丙酚不同诱导速度对无痛人工流产术的麻醉效果及不良反应。方法:将90例孕妇随机分为A、B、C3组各30例,静脉注射2μg/kg芬太尼后以不同诱导速度注入异丙酚,A组诱导速度为6mg/(kg·min),B组诱导速度为3mg/(kg·min),C组诱导速度为2mg/(kg·min),观察麻醉效果、心电监护数据、异丙酚总用量、呼吸抑制情况、苏醒时间等。结果:麻醉效果,C组24例优,A、B组分别29例优,C组麻醉效果与A、B组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);呼吸抑制情况:C组仅1例发生呼吸抑制,A组和B组分别有10例和4例发生呼吸抑制,C组与A、B组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:异丙酚以较快速度诱导患者苏醒快,异丙酚用量少,但呼吸抑制也相应增加,建议临床以3mg/(kg·min)的速度诱导麻醉效果好且安全。
Objective:To observe the effect of propofol induced velocity in different anesthesia induced abortion.Methods:90 cases of pregnant women were randomly divided into A,B,C three groups of 30 patients,propofol induced velocity in different anesthesia induced abortion observed effect,A group of induced velocity of 6 mg/(kg·min),B group of induced velocity of 3 mg/(kg·min),C group of induced velocity of 2 mg/(kg·min),observed the effect of anesthesia,ECG data,the total amount of propofol,respiratory inhibition,recovery time,etc.Results:Anesthesia,C group was 24 cases of superior,A,B groups were 29 cases of superior,the difference of anesthetic effect in group C and A,B group was significant(P0.05);Inhibition of respiration:C group,only a case of respiratory depression,group A and group B were 10 cases and 4 cases of respiratory depression,difference of group C and A,B group was significant(P0.05).Conclusion:Propofol induced a faster rate in patients wake up faster,propofol with less,however,a corresponding increase in cases of respiratory depression,the speed of the proposed clinical to 3 mg/(kg·min) effective and safe induction of anesthesia.
出处
《中国当代医药》
2011年第31期91-92,共2页
China Modern Medicine