对镇乡内“农业户口”人群普及心肺复苏技能的形式探讨

Exploration of the training form of cardlopulmonary resuscitation popularization among agricultural residence registration population in towns and villages

目的探讨对“农业户口”人群用语言或实践教育法两种不同形式进行徒手心肺复苏（cardiopulmonary resuscitation，CPR）技能培训的近、远期效果，以确定对“农业户口”人群急救技能培训的更有效方法。方法将989名“农业户口”人群随机分成A组721人和B组268人。A组用语言教育法进行CPR培训，B组用实践教育法。培训前，培训后即刻，培训后3、6个月进行考核，对考核结果进行统计学分析。结果2组采用的方法近期效果满意（正确率均〉90％），2组比较无显著差异，培训后3、6个月的效果B组优于A组，2组学员在培训后6个月时均已出现较高遗忘率。结论“农业户口”人群对急救技能培训有着同样的迫切性。从语言教育法转为实践教育法应该是对“农业户口”人群实施急救技能培训更可取的形式。同时，4h可作为CPR实践教育法培训的时长，6个月可作为复训周期。

Objective To explore the short and long-term effect of cardiopulmonary resuscitation （CPR） training for agricultural residence registration population with the language education and practice education, in order to establish a more effective method of first-aid training for agriculture population. Methods 989 agricultural residence registration people were divided into group A （721 people） and group B （268 people） randomly. Group A received CPR training with language education and group B adopted practice education. On the time before and after training immediately ,the 3rd and 6tb month after training,we checked the training results and analyzed the data with statistical methods. Results The short-term effect of two methods was satisfying （accuracy more then 90% ） and without statistical significance. The effect of group B was better than group A in the 3rd and 6th month ＇after training. Two groups showed higher forgetting rate and some accuracy were less than 50%. Conclusions Agriculture population is in urgent need of first-aid.It may be a more effective method of first-aid training for agriculture population to transform gradually from language education to practice education. At the same time, we may use 4 hours as CPR practice education training time and 6 months as re-training period.