期刊文献+

公共交通方式转移价格的排序选择模型 被引量:1

Prices Threshold of Transfer Within Public Transit Mode Based on Ordered Choices Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过意愿调查法对公共交通出行者的出行意向进行调查,研究了不同出行时间比下常规公共交通出行者转向轨道交通的意愿价格阈值影响因素及规律.基于排序选择模型,分别建立了基于排序Probit和排序Logit的公共交通内部方式转移价格阈值模型,并对模型进行局部效应分析.结果表明:性别、职业、收入、公交出行时间、公交出行费用及地铁与公交出行时间比对公共交通内部方式转移意愿价格阈值具有显著影响;常规公交费用支出每增加1元,其向轨道交通转移时的票价阈值为3、4、5、6元的概率分别改变-5.03%、1.07%、2.32%、1.00%. A survey of public transit travelers' w ess to pay was carried out in Beijing through Contingent Valuation Method and trip characteristics of public transit travelers were discussed and transfer price threshold was concluded under different time ratio between rail transit and bus. Based on Ordered choices models, transfer price threshold model within public transit were given respectively based on the Ordered Probit and the Ordered Logit Model. Finally partial effects of variables were analyzed . The results showed that gender, occupation, income, bus travel costs, and travel time ratio between rail transit and bus had a significant effect on the price threshold of the mode transfer choice, and the proportion of the price threshold of mode transfer which is 3, 4, 5, 6 Yuan, will change -5.03% , 1.07% , 2.32% , 1.00% respectively when the ticket expenditure of bus increases one Yuan more.
出处 《北京工业大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第12期1818-1823,共6页 Journal of Beijing University of Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(50678004)
关键词 公共交通 意愿调查法 转移价格 排序选择模型 public transit contingent valuation method transit transfer price ordered choice model
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1LITMAN T. Transportation Elasticities: how prices and other factors affect travel behavior [ M]. Victoria, Canada: Victoria Transport Policy Institute, 2005.
  • 2GARDNER M. Managing your money: putting a "price" on fare change [ J]. Mass Transit, 2005, 31 (1) : 24-28.
  • 3陈宽民,罗小强.城市快速轨道交通合理票价的博弈分析[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2005,25(4):52-55. 被引量:36
  • 4姚丽亚,关宏志,严海.公交票价比对公交结构的影响及方式选择模型[J].北京工业大学学报,2007,33(8):834-837. 被引量:18
  • 5HAN Yan, GUAN Hong-zhi, FANG Xue-jiao. Influence analysis of deep discount policy on public transit ridership. [ C ]// Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of Chinese Transportation Professionals, ICCTP 2009: Critical Issues in Transportation System Planning, Development, and Management. Viginia, USA : American Society of Civil Engineers, 2009 : 204-210.
  • 6SLENSMINDE K. Inconsistent choices in stated choice data: use of the logit scaling approach to handle resulting variance increases [ J ]. Transportation, 2001, 28 ( 3 ) : 269-296.
  • 7GREENE W H. Econometric analysis [ M]. 5th edition. New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall, 2009.

二级参考文献14

  • 1胡郁葱,徐建闽,靳文舟.LOGIT模型在评估旅客客运票价中的应用[J].公路交通科技,2001,18(6):130-133. 被引量:12
  • 2王山川,关宏志.联合方式划分/交通分配模型的扩展和修正研究[J].土木工程学报,2006,39(4):116-120. 被引量:7
  • 3马丁·J·奥斯本 阿里尔·鲁宾斯坦.博弈论教程[M].北京:中国社会科学院出版社,2000..
  • 4纳什.纳什博弈论文集[M].北京:首都经济贸易大学出版社,2002..
  • 5BEN A,STEVEN R L.Discrete choice analysis:theory and application to travel demand[M].Massachusetts,London,England:The Mit Press Cambridge,1985:100-129.
  • 6ANKER N.A stochastic transit assignment model considering differences in passengers utility functions[J].Transportation Research Part B,2000,34(5):377-402.
  • 7DAVID H,WILLIAN G.Specification and estimation of the nested logit model:alternative normalizations[J].Transportation Research Part B,2002,36(1):1-17.
  • 8ABDULAAL M,LEBLANC L J.Methods for combining modal split and equilibrium assignment models[J].Transportation Research,1979,13(4):292-314.
  • 9FLORLAN N.A combined trip distribution modal split and trip assignment[J].Transportation Research,1978,12(4):376-246.
  • 10JOHN S,LESTER H.Assessing the utility of private information in transportation planning studies:a case study of trip generation analysis[J].Journal of Socio-Economic Planning Sciences,2006,40(2):94-18.

共引文献52

同被引文献2

引证文献1

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部