钓鱼岛主权归属的历史与国际法分析

The Analysis on the Sovereignty History of the Diaoyu Islands and the Related International Law

中日两国大量历史文献表明,最早发现、命名和使用钓鱼岛列屿的是中国人,而不是琉球人或日本人。钓鱼岛列屿并不属于"旧琉球王朝的势力所及范围",该列屿在明朝便被纳入中国的海防及行政管制区域。1951年的《旧金山和约》根本没有涉及钓鱼岛列屿的主权问题。1952年美国托管当局将钓鱼岛列屿划入琉球列岛地理境界的经纬度内,这是极不适当的和不合国际法的。因此,日本声称拥有该列屿主权在国际法上不能成立。

Abundant Chinese and Japanese history literatures show that, it was Chinese who firstly found, named and controlled the Diaoyu Islands, not the Ryukyuan (琉球人)or Japanese. Diaoyu Island did not belong to ancient Ryukyu kingdom, but was controlled by Ming Empire as coastal defense and administrative control area. San Francisco Peace Treaty did not involve the sovereignty of Diaoyu Islands in 1951 and it was inappropriate and inconsistent for the American mandatory authorities to classify Diaoyu Islands to the longitude and latitude of Ryukyu archipelago in 1952. Therefore the claims of having sovereignty to Diaoyu Islands of Japan could not be established.