4KRONICK D A. Peer review in 18th- century scientific journalism[ J]. JAMA, 1990, 263 (10): 1 321 -1 322
5BINGHAM C M, HIGGINS G, COLEMAN R, et al. The Medical Journal of Australia internet peer review study[J]. Lancet, 1998, 352:441 -445
6WALSH E, ROONEY M, APPLEBY L, et al. Open peer review: a randomised controlled trail[J]. Br J Psychiatry,2000
7BLACK N, VAN R S, GODLEE F,et al. What makes a good reviewer and a Good review for a general medical journal[J].JAMA, 1998,280:231 - 233
8LINK A M. US and non- US submission: an analysis of reviewers bias[J]. JAMA, 1998, 280(3) :246 -7
9ERNST E, SARADETH T, RESCH K L. Drawbacks of peer review[J]. Nature, 1993, 363:296
10CALLAHAM M L,KNOPP R K, GALLAGHER E J. Effect of Written Feedback by Editors on Quality of Reviews [ J ]: Two Randomized Trials. JAMA. 2002,287(21) :2 781 -2 783
5Jeffweson T, Wager E, Davidoff F. Measuring the quality of editorial peer review [J]. JAMA,2002,287(21 ) : 2786 -2790.
6Shahok K. Content and communication: how can peer review provide helpful feedback about the writing? [ J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2008, 31 ( 8 ) : 3.
8Systems: An Open, Two-stage Peer-review Journal. Nature (2006) doi:10. 1038/nature04988. [ EB/OL ]. http://www. nature, corn/nature/peerreview/debate/nature04988, html [2015 -5 -15].
9Elsevier Pilots PeerChoice in Chemical Physics Letters. I EB! OL]. http://www, redorbit, com/news/business/1881910/elsevier _pilots__peerchoice_in_chemical physics_letters/ [2015-5-5].
