期刊文献+

年龄对全盆底重建联合抗压力性尿失禁手术后患者主观感觉的影响 被引量:2

Effect of age on the subjective feelings of patients after total pelvic floor reconstruction combined with stress-urinary-incontinence surgery
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨盆底功能障碍患者行全盆底重建联合抗压力性尿失禁手术后年龄对患者主观感觉及生活质量的影响。方法:回顾性分析61例年龄<65岁和35例年龄≥65岁同时进行了TVT-O和PROLIFT手术患者的临床资料,对术前及术后生活质量评分对比研究,分析年龄对术后效果的影响。结果:平均随访时间24.2个月,两组患者术后症状和生活质量均明显提高,术后两组均有PFDI-20和PFIQ-7直肠及排尿功能评分整体及独自的提高;≥65岁组与<65岁组相比有略低的PFDI-20评分提高,平均提高63±31;两组PFIQ-7评分整体提高无显著差异,≥65岁组30.8±42,<65岁组49.8±60。结论:65岁或更年长妇女经历了SUI联合POP的手术,有更高的再发SUI风险,但在症状与生活质量方面仍有很大提高。 Objective:To explore the effect of age on the subjective feelings and quality of life of patients with pelvic floor dysfunction after total pelvic floor reconstruction combined with stress-urinary-incontinence surgery.Methods:The clinical data of 61 cases(65 years) and 35 cases(≥65 years) who received TVT-O and PROLIFT at the same time were analyzed retrospectively,the scores of quality of life before and after surgery were compared and researched,the effect of age on postoperative efficacy was analyzed.Results:The average follow-up time was 24.2 months.In the two groups,the postoperative symptoms and qualities of life were improved significantly;after surgery,the total score and single score of rectum and urinary function displayed by PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 increased in the two groups;compared with 65-year group,the score of PFDI-20 in ≥65-year group increased by(63±31);there was no significant difference in the increasing extent of total score of PFIQ-7 between ≥65-year group(30.8±42) and 65-year group(49.8±60).Conclusion:The ≥65-year-old women who received total pelvic floor reconstruction combined with stress-urinary-incontinence surgery have higher recurrence risk of stress urinary incontinence,but the symptoms and quality of life are improved significantly.
作者 程大丽
出处 《中国妇幼保健》 CAS 北大核心 2011年第34期5304-5306,共3页 Maternal and Child Health Care of China
关键词 年龄 盆底功能障碍 尿失禁 Age Pelvic floor dysfunction Urinary incontinence
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction [ J] . Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1996, 175:10.
  • 2Sandvik H, Espuna M, Hunskaar S. Validity of the incontinence severi- ty index: comparison with pad -weighing tests[ J ] . Int Urogynecol Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 2006, 17:520.
  • 3Barber MD, Waiters MD, Bump RC. Shortforms of two condition - spe- cific quality - of - life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disor- ders ( PFDI - 20 and PFIQ - 7 ) [ J ] . Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 193 : 103.
  • 4Walsh TH. Audit of outcome of major surgery in the elderly [ J ] . Br J Surg, 1996, 83:92.
  • 5Edwards AE, Seymour DG, McCarthy JM et al. A 5 - year survival smdy of general surgical patients aged 65 years and over [J] . Anaes- thesia, 1996, 51:3.
  • 6Carey JM, Leach GE. Transvaginal surgery in the octogenarian using ca- daveric fascia for pelvic prolapse and stress incontinence : minimal one - year results compared to younger patients [ J ] . Urology, 2004, 63 : 665.
  • 7Sharp VJ, Bradley CS, Kreder KJ. Incontinence surgery in the older woman [J] . Curr Opin Urol, 2006, 16:224.
  • 8Gordon D, Gold R, Pauzner D et al. Tension - free vaginal tape in the elderly: is it a safe procedure [J] ? Urology, 2005, 65:479.
  • 9Sung VW, Glasgow MA, Wohlmb KJ et al. Impact of age on preopera- tive and postoperative urinary incontinence quality of life [ J ] . Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 197:680.

同被引文献26

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部