期刊文献+

规模养猪场环境微生物污染动态的监测 被引量:6

Dynamic Monitoring of Microbial Contamination in Environment of Scale Pig Farms in Guizhou
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为掌握贵州省规模化养猪场主要疫病发生发展与环境微生物的关系,通过细菌计数与分离鉴定对2个规模化养猪场周围环境的空气、饮用水、污水、粪便和土壤样本细菌总数和优势细菌进行了监测。结果表明,猪场空气、饮用水、污水、粪便和土壤的细菌总数分别为0.215×104~24.9×104 CFU/m3、0.15×102~10×102CFU/m3、2.84×107~79.30×107 CFU/m3、8.96×106~295×106 CFU/m3和0.213×105~14.5×105CFU/m3;优势菌群为葡萄球菌、链球菌、大肠埃希氏菌、沙门氏菌、芽孢杆菌和志贺氏菌等。 Total bacterial count and dominant bacterial flora of air,drinking water,sewage,dung and soil samples from the surrounding environment of two scale pig farms were monitored by bacterial counting,isolation and identification to master the relationship between occurrence and development of main diseases and environmental microbial in the scale pig farm in Guizhou.The results showed that total bacterial count of air,drinking water,sewage,dung and soil samples from the surrounding environment of two scale pig farms was 0.215×104~24.9×104CFU/m3,0.15×102~10×102CFU/m3,2.84×107~79.30×107CFU/m3,8.96×106~295×106CFU/m3 and 0.213×105~14.5×105CFU/m3 and the dominant bacterial flora was Staphylococcus,Streptococcus,Escherichia coli,Salmonella,Bacillus and Shigella separately.
出处 《贵州农业科学》 CAS 北大核心 2011年第11期155-157,161,共4页 Guizhou Agricultural Sciences
基金 贵州省科技支撑计划项目(农业攻关)"规模养殖场环境健康监测与控制研究"[黔科合NY字(2009)3069] 贵州大学大学生创新性实验计划项目[贵大创字(2009)037] 贵州省农业委员会科技计划项目"贵州省主要动物疫病血清学监测与流行病学调查研究"(2010-11)
关键词 规模养猪场 优势菌群 细菌总数 污染监测 scale pig farms dominant bacterial flora total bacterial count contamination monitoring
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献30

  • 1甘孟侯.目前我国畜禽疫病发生的现状及控制[J].畜牧与兽医,2004,36(7):1-3. 被引量:12
  • 2Pererira - Neto JY, Stentiford EI, Smith DV. Survival of faecal indicator micro - organisms in refuse/sludge composting using the aerated static pole system[J]. Waste Management and Research, 1986,4:397~406.
  • 3Pererira - Neto JY, Stenford EI. Mara DD. Comparative survival of pathogenic indicatiors in windrow and satatic pile [ A ]. In: Mdebertoldi, Hermite PL, Ferranti MP, et al. Compost: Production, Quality and Use [ C ]. New York: Elsvier Applied Science Publishing Company. 1987. 276 ~ 293.
  • 4Soares HM, Cardenas BC. Evaluating pathogen regrowth in biosolids compost [ J]. Biocycle, 1995,36 (6) :70 ~ 76.
  • 5Gagliaedi JV, Karns JS. Leaching of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in diverse soils under various agricultural management practices[ J]. Appl Environ Microbiol,2000 ,66 :877 ~ 886.
  • 6Jiang XP, Morgan J. Fate of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in manure -amended soil[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2002,68 ( 5 ): 2605 ~2609.
  • 7Wang GT Zhao, Doyle MP. Fate of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 in bovine feces[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1996,62(7) :2567 ~2570.
  • 8Francis JL, Jay L. Yanke fate of coliform bacteria in composted beef cattle feedlot manure [J]. Environ Qual,2003,32:1508 ~ 1515.
  • 9Guo X, Chen J. Survival of Salmonella on tomatoes stored at high relative humidity, in soil, and on tomatoes in contact with soil[J].J Food Prot,2002,65:274 ~ 279.
  • 10Howell JM, Coyne MS, Cornelius P. Fecal bacteria in agricultural waters of the bluegrass region of Kentucky [J]. J Environ Qual,1995,24:411~419.

共引文献51

同被引文献45

引证文献6

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部