期刊文献+

从理念转变到多元协作——略论美国家事纠纷解决机制新发展 被引量:12

From Rethink to Collaboration——On the recent advance of the family dispute resolution mechanism in USA
原文传递
导出
摘要 在过去的二十年间,美国家事纠纷解决机制经历了理念与制度上的转变,主要体现在对对抗制诉讼程序的反思、对家事纠纷自身属性的深刻理解和对家事纠纷解决机制目的的重新认识三个方面,并在此基础之上产生出一系列新的制度和程序,从而体现出法院与其他社会组织协同合作,共同解决家事纠纷的新趋势。而这种转变也为我国家事纠纷解决机制的完善提供了新的思路。 The family dispute resolution mechanism in USA had been changed both in concept and mechanism during the recent 20 years.The changes include three components.The first component is a profound skepticism about the value of traditional adversary procedures.The second component is the deep understanding of family dispute itself.The third component is the rethink of the purpose of family dispute resolution mechanism.And there were many new procedures and mechanism in USA.The court and other organizations had worked together to resolute family dispute.Those changes would be helpful for us to reform our mechanism.
作者 杨冰
出处 《河北法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第12期177-182,共6页 Hebei Law Science
基金 2010年度国家社会科学基金一般项目<夫妻财产关系法研究>(10BFX060)的阶段性成果之一
关键词 家事纠纷 回溯型诉讼程序 多元协作 family dispute backward-looking process collaboration
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Jana B. Singer:Dispute Resolution and the Post-Divorce Family: hnplieations of a Paradigm Shift[ J ], Family Court Review, Vol. 47, No. 3, July 2009.
  • 2Robert E. Emery. Renegotiating Family Relationships: Divorce, Child Custody, and Mediation 205 (1994).
  • 3Richard Boldt & Jana Singer. Juristocracy in the Trenches: Problem-Solving Judges and Therapeutie Jurisprudence in Drug Treatment Courts and Unified Family Courts[J]. Maryland Law Review, Vol. 65, No. 1.
  • 4Andrew Schepard & Peter Salem. Foreward to the Special Issue on the Family Law Education Reform Project, Famil) Court Review,516 (2006).
  • 5Andrew Sehepard & James W. Bozzomo. Efficiency, therapeutic justice, mediation, and evaluation : reflections on a survey of unified family courts[ J]. Family law quarterly, Vol. 37.
  • 6M. Robin Dion. Healthy Marriage Programs: Learning What Works[J]. 15 FUTURE OF CHILD. 139(2005).
  • 7Bruce J. Winick. A Legal Autopsy of the Lawyering in Sehiavo: A Therapeutic Jurisprudence/Preventive lJaw Rewind Exer- cise[ J ]. University of Miami Law Review, Vol. 6, 2007.
  • 8Solveig Erickson & Nancy Vet Steegh. Mandatory Divorce Education: What Do the Parents Say[ J ]. William Mitchell Law Re- view, Vol. 28.
  • 9Nancy Ver Steegh. Family Court Reform and ADR: Shifting Values and Expectations Transform the l]ivoree Process[ J ]. Family Law Quarterly, Vol. 42, No. 3, 2008.
  • 10Andrew Sehepard. An Introduction to the Model Standards of Practice for Family and Divorce Mediation[ J]. Family Law Quar- terly, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2001.

同被引文献66

引证文献12

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部