美国基于标准的优秀教师认证评价开发研究被引量：5

A Study on Development of NBPTS Standards-based Teacher Certification Assessment

导出

摘要认证评价是对标准文本的实践解读,是使教学标准从文本状态转化为实践状态的手段和桥梁。舒尔曼团队的研究为美国基于标准的认证评价开发奠定了理论基础;以档案袋评价取代传统评价方式,为认证评价开发确立了基调;使认证评价能够用来评价极度复杂的、真实的教学实践,并使认证评价能够促进教师的专业发展,是美国优秀教师专业教学标准委员会评价开发的重点;管理上的可行性、专业领域的可接受性、公众方面的可信任性、法律方面的可辩护性、经济方面的可负担性是对评价开发者的理念和成果进行评估的标准。 Certification assessment is the practical interpretation to standards content,the means and bridges to turn standards content into practice.The research by Schulman and his team laid a theoretical foundation for the development of NBPTS Standards-based teacher certification assessment;to replace the traditional evaluation methods by portfolio assessment set the tone for certification;That the certification assessment can be used to evaluate highly complex,real teaching practice,and to promote the professional development of teachers are the focuses of the assessment development;Management feasibility,acceptability of areas of expertise,the public＇s trust,legal defensibility and economic affordability are the criteria to evaluate the ideas and results of assessment developers.

作者陈德云

机构地区临沂大学副教授

出处《全球教育展望》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第12期67-71,94,共6页 Global Education

关键词教师专业教学标准教师认证评价开发教师专业教学委员会 professional standards for accomplished teachers standards-based teacher certification assessment National Board for Professional Teaching standards

分类号 G571.2 [文化科学—教育技术学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献8

1Lawrence Ingvarson, Assessing Teachers for Professional Certification: The First Decade of the National" Board for Professional Teaching Standards. Advances in Program Evaluation, Volume 11, 1 - 21. 2008 Elsevier Ltd.
2Carnegie Task Force on Teaching as a Profession. (1986). A nation prepared: Teachers for the 21st century. Hyattsville, MD: Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy.
3Shulwan, L. S. (1987b). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1 - 22.
4National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. ( 1991 ). Ini tial policies and perspectives of the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (3rd edition). Detroit : Author.
5Shulman, L. S. (1987a). Assessment for teaching: An initiative for the profession. Phi Delta Kappan, 69, 38-44.
6Frederiksen, J. R., & Wolfe, E. W. (1992). A report from the video portiolio project: Standards of the NBPTS thai are amenable to video portfolio assessment. Princeton, NJ : Educational Testing Service.
7Frederiksen, J. R. , & Collins, A. (1989). A systems approach to educational testing. Educational Researcher, 18(9), 27 -32.
8National Board for Professional Teaehing Standards. ( 1991 ). Initial policies and perspectives of the National Board tot Professional Teaching Standards (3rd edition). Detroit : Author.