引文分析与互文性分析——图书情报学研究应该关注互文性分析

Citation Analysis and Intertextuality Analysis——LIS Research Should Focus on Intertextuality Analysis

引文分析是图书情报学的重要贡献。引文分析的局限性表现在三个方面:对伪引的难以控制、对漏引的难以确认和对引用动机的难以辩识。引文分析局限性的根源在于"唯引是举"。引文分析是以整部文献为单元的分析,而互文性分析是以一个文本内部的话语为单元的分析。引文分析是基于形式的表层分析,而互文性分析是基于内容的批评性分析。互文性分析的目的在于揭示文本话语隐含的文化、心理、政治意义。互文性分析中的互文性类型包括语句互文、字词互文、体裁互文、修辞互文等。图书情报学理论应该关注互文性分析。进行互文性分析,有利于拓宽和深化图书情报学理论,有利于加强图书情报学理论的社会影响力。互文性分析与内容分析之间有区别。

Citation analysis is an important contribution of LIS.The limitations of citation analysis lie in three respects,that is,the false citation is refractory,the missing citation is difficult to confirm and the citation motivation is difficult to identify.The limitations of the citation analysis originate in that ＂any annotation is effective＂.Citation analysis is based on taking the entire document as a unit to analyze,while intertextuality analysis is based on taking the discourse in a text as a unit to analyze.Citation analysis is form-based superficial analysis,while intertextuality analysis is content-based critical analysis.Intertextuality analysis aims to reveal the cultural,psychological,political significance implied in the discourse of the text.Intertextuality types of the intertextuality analysis lie in the statement,the word,the genre,the rhetoric.LIS research should focus on intertextuality analysis.Intertextuality analysis is conducive to broaden and deepen the LIS theory,to strengthen the social influence of LIS theory.There are many differences between intertextuality analysis and content analysis.