期刊文献+

信息的不同效价匹配对决策者职业决策行为的影响 被引量:1

THE EFFECTS OF VALENCE MATCHING OF DIFFERENT INFORMATION ON DECISION-MAKERS′OCCUPATIONAL OPTION BEHAVIOR
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用2(信息类型:个体背景信息、价值取向信息)×2(匹配方式:高效价匹配、低效价匹配)的混合实验设计,探讨了决策者在职业决策即时情境中对不同效价信息匹配的觉知水平、信息搜集策略的应用以及职业选择行为。结果发现:(1)决策者对不同类型信息的觉知水平存在显著性差异,而且匹配方式也对信息觉知水平具有显著影响;(2)决策者在不同信息的不同效价匹配情境中决策策略的应用是不同的;(3)信息类型对决策行为存在显著性影响,而信息效价对决策行为的影响因信息的不同而不同。 This experiment adopts 2 (the type of information: individual background information and value orientating information) x2 (the way of matching: higher valence matching and lower valence matching) mixed design in or- der to discuss the decision-makers' awareness level to information in the different way of matching, the applica- tion of decision strategy and occupational option behavior in the instance career decision situation, the results show that: (1) there are significant difference in the awareness level to different type of information, and the level of awareness to information was affected by the way of matching; (2) the application of decision-making strategies are different in the instance situation; (3) the occupational decision behaviors were affected by the different type information, meanwhile the effect of information valence were vary with the change of different type information.
作者 康廷虎 王沛
出处 《心理与行为研究》 CSSCI 2011年第4期247-250,共4页 Studies of Psychology and Behavior
基金 西北师范大学"知识与科技创新工程"科研骨干培育项目(NWNU-KJCXGC-SK0303-10) 甘肃省教育科学"十一五"规划课题(GSBG[2009]GXG137)
关键词 信息类型 信息效价 职业决策 the type of information, the valence of information, career decision.
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Klein G ,Kaempf G L, et al. Applying decision requirements to user-centered design. International Journal of Human-omputer Studies 1997, 46:1-15.
  • 2Germeijs V, Boeck P D. Career indecision: Three factors from decision theory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2003, 62:11-25.
  • 3Singh R, Greenhaus J H. The relation between career decision- making strategies aud person-job fit: study of job changer. Jour- nal of Vocational Behavior. 2004, 64:198-221.
  • 4Vlaev I, Chater N. Game relativity: How context influences strategic decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2006, 32 (1) : 131-149.
  • 5Harren V A. A model of career decision-making for college stu- dents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1979, 14:119-133.
  • 6Greenhaus J H. Career dynamoics. Industrial and Organization Psychology, 2002, 12:519-540.
  • 7王沛,康廷虎.大学生择业价值取向调查问卷的编制及初步研究[J].应用心理学,2005,11(2):143-148. 被引量:38
  • 8李家华,吴庆.2000年北京地区大学生就业状况调查报告[J].青年研究,2001(3):1-8. 被引量:35
  • 9Shiloh S. Shenhav-Sheffer M. Structure of difficulties in mate-selec- tion decisions and its relationship to rational and intuitive cognitive styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 2004, 37:259-273.
  • 10Galotti K. M. Making decisions that matter: how people face im- portant life choices. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 2002:35-47.

二级参考文献11

共引文献71

同被引文献31

  • 1张建新.殊化信任与泛化信任在人际信任行为路径模型中的作用[J].心理学报,2000,32(3):312-312.
  • 2Bonaccio, S., & Dalal, R. S. (2006). Advice taking and decision- making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the or- ganizational sciences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101(2), 127 - 151.
  • 3Brunel, O., & Pichon, P. E. (2004). Food-related risk-reduction strat- egies : purchasing and consumption processes. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 3(4), 360 - 374.
  • 4Cho, J. (2006). The mechanism of trust and distrust formation and their relational outcomes. Journal of Retailing, 82 ( 1 ) ,25 - 35.
  • 5Cook, K. S. (2005). Networks, norms, and trust: The social psychol- ogy of social capital, cooley mead award address. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), 4-14.
  • 6Gardner, P. H., & Berry, D. C. (1995). The effect of different forms of advice on the control of a simulated complex system. Applied Cog- nitive Psychology, 9(7), 55-79.
  • 7Gantner, A., Guth, W. & KOnigstein, M. (2000). Equitable choices in bargaining games with joint production. Journal of Economic Behav- ior and Organization, 46, 209 - 225.
  • 8Gino, F., Shang, J., & Croson, R. (2009). The impact of information from similar or different advisors on judgment. Organizational Be- havior and Human Decision Processes, 108(2) , 287 -302.
  • 9Gibbons, A. M., Sniezek, J. A., & Dalai, R. S. (2003). Antecedents and consequences of unsolicited versus explicitly solicited advice. Paper presented at the D. Budescu ( Chair), Symposium in Honor of Janet Sniezek. Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the society for judgment and decision making, Vancouver, BC.
  • 10Gino, F., & Moore, D. A. (2007). Effects of task difficulty on use of advice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20 ( 1 ), 21 -35.

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部