期刊文献+

2型糖尿病HbA_1c筛查值和诊断值的探讨 被引量:3

Investigation of the HbA_1c values in screening and diagnosing type 2 diabetes mellitus
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评估HbA_1c在筛查和诊断T2DM中的有效性。方法对497例(男361例,女136例)体检FPG≥5.6 mmol/L者行OGTT并测定HbA_1c、血脂、尿酸、血压等代谢指标。结果 (1)应用受试者工作特性曲线(ROC)进行统计分析,与OGTT诊断DM的相关HbA^1c最佳切点为6.3%,敏感性和特异性分别是79.60%和82.20%,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.873(95%CI 0.831~0.916),HbA^1c为6.5%时的敏感性和特异性分别是62.70%和93.50%。(2)按2010年ADA的DM诊断标准,分别按HbA_1c≥6.5%或OGTT标准诊断DM,无论是否去除两组重叠部分,以HbA_1c≥6.5%标准诊断的DM组的HbA_1c水平显著高于以OGTT标准诊断的DM组,而FPG、2hPG均显著低于以OGTT标准诊断的DM组,其余代谢指标如血压、血脂、尿酸等均无统计学差异。结论当HbA-1c≥6.3%时应进一步行OGTT以明确有无DM,而HbA_1c≥6.5%具有较好的特异性可用于诊断DM,与ADA的推荐一致。 Objective To invettigate the T2DM (type 2 diabetes) screening and diagnosing with HbA1 c values. Methods A total of 497 patients with fasting plasma glucoseS5.6 mmol/L (361 men and 136 women)were selected. An oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed, and HbA1 c,blood lipids, uric acid, and blood pressure were measured. Results Using a receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve), the optimal cut-point of HbA~ c for diagnosis of T2DM was 6.3%, matched to OGTT for diagnosis of diabetes, with a sensitivity and specificity of 79.60% and 82.20% respectively, and area under the curve (AUC) was 0. 873 (95%CI 0. 831-0. 916). The HbA1c level of 6.5% for diagnosis of diabetes had sensitivity and specificity of 62. 70% and 93.50%, respectively. On the basis of HbA1c≥ 6.5% or OGTT criteria for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus by ADA 2010, the HbA1c group had significantly higher HbA1 c level than did the OGTT group, had significantly lower levels of FPG and 2hPO than did the OGTT group. There were no significant differences in blood lipids, uric acid and blood pressure between two groups. Conclusions When HbA1 c≥6.3 %, an OGTT should be used to confirm the diagnosis of diabetes. A HbA1c cut point of 6.5% has a specificity of 93.50% for diagnosis of diabetes, which is in complete concordance with ADA recommendation.
出处 《中国糖尿病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第12期910-913,共4页 Chinese Journal of Diabetes
基金 江苏省卫生厅科研项目(H200931) 江苏省科技厅项目(BK2010089)
关键词 糖化血红蛋白 空腹血糖 口服葡萄糖耐量试验 糖尿病诊断 Glycated haemoglobin Fasting plasma glucose Oral glucose tolerance test Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care, 2008, 31 (S1):S55-S60.
  • 2American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes--2010. Diabetes Care, 2010 ,33 (S1):S11-S61.
  • 3The International Expert Committee. International Expert Committee report on the role of the AIC assay in the diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care, 2009,32: 1327-1334.
  • 4Motta M, Bennati E, Cardillo E, et al. The value of glycosy lated hemoglobin (HbA1 c) as a predictive risk factor in the di agnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM) in the elderly. Arch Geron tol Geriatr, 2010, 50:60-64.
  • 5Herman WH, Fajans SS. Hemoglobin Ale for the diagnosis of diabetes. Pol Arch Med Wewn, 2010, 120:37-40.
  • 6Herman WH, Ma Y, Uwaifo G, et al. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Differences in Alc by race and eth- nicity among patients with impaired glucose tolerance in the Di- abetes Prevention Program. Diabetes Care, 2007, 30: 2453-2457.
  • 7Viberti G, Lachin J, Holman R, et al. A Diabetes Outcome Progression Trial (ADOPT): baseline characteristics of type 2 diabetic patients in North America and Europe. Diabet Med, 2006, 23:1289-1294.
  • 8Manley SE, Sikaris KA, Lu ZX, et al. Validation of an algo- rithm combining haemoglobin A(lc) and fasting plasma glucose for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus in UK and Australian popula- tions. Diabet Med, 2009, 26: 115-121.
  • 9周翔海,纪立农.空腹血糖和糖化血红蛋白用于筛查糖尿病的研究[J].中华糖尿病杂志(1006-6187),2005,13(3):203-205. 被引量:157
  • 10American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care, 2010, 33(S1):S62-S69.

二级参考文献10

  • 1Is fasting glucose sufficient to define diabetes? Epidemiological data from 20 European studies. The DECODE-study group. European Diabetes Epidemiology Group. Diabetes Epidemiology: Collaborative analysis of Diagnostic Criteria in Europe. Diabetologia, 1999, 42: 647-654.
  • 2Deepa R, Shanthi Rani S, Premalatha G, et al. Comparison of ADA 1997 and WHO 1985 criteria for diabetes in south Indians-the Chennai Urban Population Study. American Diabetes Association. Diabet Med, 2000, 17: 872-874.
  • 3Gomez-Perez FJ, Aguilar-Salinas CA, Lopez-Alvarenga JC, et al. Lack of agreement between the World Health Organization Category of impaired glucose tolerance and the American Diabetes Association category of impaired fasting glucose. Diabetes Care, 1998, 21: 1886-1888.
  • 4Wahl PW, Savage PJ, Psaty BM, et al. Diabetes in older adults: comparison of 1997 American Diabetes Association classification of diabetes mellitus with 1985 WHO classification. Lancet, 1998, 352: 1012-1015.
  • 5Burke JP, Haffner SM, Gaskill SP, et al. Reversion from type 2 diabetes to nondiabetic status. Influence of the 1997 American Diabetes Association criteria. Diabetes Care, 1998, 21: 1266-1270.
  • 6Kilpatrick ES, Maylor PW, Keevil BG. Biological variation of glycated hemoglobin. Implications for diabetes screening and monitoring. Diabetes Care, 1998, 21: 261-264.
  • 7Rohlfing CL, Little RR, Wiedmeyer HM, et al. Use of GHb (HbA1c) in screening for undiagnosed diabetes in the US population. Diabetes Care, 2000, 23: 187-191.
  • 8Wiener K, Roberts NB. The relative merits of haemoglobin A1c and fasting plasma glucose as first-line diagnostic tests for diabetes mellitus in non-pregnant subjects. Diabet Med, 1998, 15: 558-563.
  • 9Davidson MB, Schriger DL, Peters AL, et al. Relationship between fasting plasma glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin: potential for false-positive diagnoses of type 2 diabetes using new diagnostic criteria. JAMA, 1999, 281: 1203-1210.
  • 10Anand SS, Razak F, Vuksan V, et al. Diagnostic strategies to detect glucose intolerance in a multiethnic Population. Diabetes Care, 2003, 26: 290-296.

共引文献156

同被引文献25

引证文献3

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部