期刊文献+

胃粘膜损伤中EB病毒感染与P53抑癌基因突变的研究 被引量:8

EB Virus Infection and Mutation of p53 Suppressor Gene in Gastric Mucoma Damages
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了探讨EB病毒(EBV)感染与胃癌发生的关系,应用PCR技术对166例胃粘膜损伤标本的EBVDNA进行检测.其中66例应用银染PCR-SSCP分析技术检测了p53exon5~8突变情况,10例应用直接法原位PCR技术检测了EBV在组织中的感染情况。结果166例标本中EBV感染率为30.1%;EBV在细胞中感染大体是弥散型,主要存在于细胞核。66例标本中p53基因突变率为54.5%。对比分析,EBV阳性标本中p53基因突变率为75%(21/28),EBV阴性标本中p53基因突变率为39.5%(15/38)。结果表明,EBV对胃粘膜组织细胞具有易感性,p53基因突变在胃粘膜病变中是一个常发事件,EBV感染与p53基因突变之间存在着高度相关性.对癌症的发生具有重要作用。 To investigate the relationship between EBV infection and genesis of gastric cancer,PCR, PCR-SSCP assay and direct in situ PCR technique were performed on samples of gastricmucoma damages; EBV infection rate was 30. 1 % in 166 samples; EBV was scattered in tissuesand roughly in nucleuses. p53 gene mutation rate was 54. 5% in 66 samples. In contrast, p53gene mutation rate was 75% in EBV-positive samples (21/28), but 39. 5 % in EBV-negative ones(15/38). The results suggest that EBV is infectious for gastric mucoma cells, p53 gene mutationis common in gastric mucoma pathological changes, EBV infection has high correlation with p53mutation, and is of importance during the genesis of cancer.
出处 《中国病毒学》 CSCD 1999年第4期295-303,共9页 Virologica Sinica
关键词 P53基因 胃粘膜损伤 胃癌 EBV 抑癌基因 PCR EB virus, p53 gene, Polymerase chain reaction, PCR-SSCP assay, Gastric mucoma damage
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1姚庆云 Rickinson AB 等.健康人口腔中EB病毒排出情况的研究[J].病毒学报,1985,1:1-3.
  • 2李诤,吕有勇.p53基因点突变与胃粘膜细胞癌变的关系[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1998,20(2):90-93. 被引量:18
  • 3Pittaluga S,Modern Pathol,1992年,5卷,661页
  • 4Sixbey J W,Science,1992年,255卷,1578页
  • 5李诤,中华肿瘤杂志,1988年,20卷,2期,90页
  • 6姚庆云,病毒学报,1985年,1卷,1页

二级参考文献1

  • 1吕有勇,中华医学杂志,1995年,75卷,679页

共引文献18

同被引文献57

  • 1殷凡,孙萍,罗兵.EB病毒早期基因BHRF1—Bcl-2的病毒性同源基因[J].国外医学(病毒学分册),2005,12(2):51-55. 被引量:3
  • 2陆超,吴升华,陈吉庆,赵非,池霞,潘晓勤,费莉,郭梅,黄松明,郭锡熔,陈荣华.Smac基因的克隆及其对Burkitt′s淋巴瘤[J].中华儿科杂志,2005,43(7):503-506. 被引量:4
  • 3李柱虎,Lee Mija.TGF-β1对Burkitt淋巴瘤细胞增殖及c-myc表达的影响[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2006,13(8):589-591. 被引量:7
  • 4奥斯伯 布伦特 等.精编分子生物学实验指南[M].北京:科学出版社,1998.37-38,55-68,589.
  • 5Tsoukas CD, Lambris JD. Expression of EBV/C3d receptors on T- cells : biological significance [J]. Immunology Today, 1993,14 ( 2 ) : 56.
  • 6Kim D H, Ko Y H, Suh Y, et al. Characteristics of Epstein-Barr virus associated childhood non-Hodgkin' s lymphoma in the Republic of Korea [J].Virchows Arch,2005,447 (3) :593.
  • 7Blood A, Edwards CJ, Ishii HH, et al. Epstein-Barr virus-mediated protection against etoposide-induced apoptosis in BJA-B B cell lymphoma cells:role of Bcl-2 and caspase proteins [J]. Archives of Virology, 2004,149 ( 2 ) : 289.
  • 8Gore M, Hutt-Fletcher LM. The BDLF2 protein of Epstein-Barr virus is a type Ⅱ glycosylated envelope protein whose processing is dependent on coexpression with the BMRF2 protein[J]. Virology,2009,383 (1) :162.
  • 9Fujiwara S, Liu EG,Shimizu K, et al. The Amino Acid region 248-382 of the Epstein-Barr virus nuclear protein 2 is responsible for the EBNA2-indueed EBV reactivation [J]. Virus Genes ,2001,23 ( 3 ) :361.
  • 10Kelly GL, Milner AE, Tierney RJ, et al. Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 2(EBNA2) gene deletion is consistently linked with EBNA3A,- 3B, and-3C expression in Burkitt' s lymphoma cells and with increased resistance to apoptosis [J]. Virology,2005,79 ( 16 ) : 10709.

引证文献8

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部