期刊文献+

版权、运行的电子控制与大众市场许可——对美国《统一计算机信息交易法》若干制度的法经济学分析 被引量:3

Copyright,Electronic Regulation of Performance and Mass-market License
下载PDF
导出
摘要 作为正面回应数字时代挑战的立法成果,美国《统一计算机信息交易法》具有深刻的理论研究价值。其所倡导的"市场二分法"以及大众市场许可、运行的电子控制、电子自助等制度设计,实际上是试图建立一套倡导"价格歧视",以授权许可合同为基础、电子限制措施为辅助的授权使用机制来达到效率最优状态,但这种理论上的效率最优存在与知识产权法的根本目标相冲突的可能。因此,我国在构建本国著作权授权许可制度、完善知识产权法律的过程中必须从宏观角度考量国家知识产权战略,完善我国合理使用制度,为平衡著作权利益与公共利益留下应有的空间。 As a positive respond to the challenges of the digital age,UCITA as a legislative achievement has profound theoretical and actual value.With its 'market dichotomy' and mass-market-license,electronic regulation of performance and electronic self-help regime,it is actually trying to build a set of license regime which advocate 'Price Discrimination Scheme' and the combination of the license contract and electronic regulation measures,to achieve the state of efficiency maximum.But this kind of theoretical efficiency maximum may conflict with the final objective of the Intellectual Property Law.Thus,in the progress of building China's copyright license regime and rebuilding our Intellectual Property Law,we should consider our national intellectual property strategy in a macroscopic perspective and perfect our fair use regime,then leave due space for the balance between copyright interests and public interests.
作者 何天翔
出处 《暨南学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第5期77-84,162,共8页 Jinan Journal(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金 国家社会科学基金项目<经济全球化与中国电子商务法律研究>(项目批准号:07BFX079)
关键词 大众市场许可 运行的电子控制 合理使用 价格歧视 mass-market license electronic regulation of performance fair use price discrimination scheme
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献92

  • 1崔国斌.知识产权法官造法批判[J].中国法学,2006(1):144-164. 被引量:180
  • 2李扬.知识产权法定主义及其适用——兼与梁慧星、易继明教授商榷[J].法学研究,2006,28(2):3-16. 被引量:85
  • 3Patrick Thibodeau,Sponsors Surrender Wont End UCITA Battle;Related licensing issues still expected to surface in new vendor contracts[J/OL]. Computerworld,2003-08-11, [2008-8-30]. http://www.computer world.eom/govemmenttopics/govemment/legislation/story/O,10801,83870.00.html.
  • 4Vault Corp. v. Quaid Software,Ltd. (Sth Cir. 1988).
  • 5ProCD,Inc. v. Zeidenberg. (7th Cir. 1996).
  • 6Vault Corp. v. Quaid Software,Ltd.,655 F. Supp. 763(E.D. La. 1987).
  • 7Vault Corp. v. Quaid Software,I,td.,847 F.2d 255(5th Cir. 1988).
  • 8See Step-Saver Data Sys.,Inc. v. Wyse Technology.,939 F.2d 91(3d Cir. 1991),Arizona Retail Sys.,Inc. v. Software Link,Inc.,831 F. Supp. 759(D. Ariz. 1993).
  • 9See U.C.C.(1996)§ 2-207.
  • 10Pro CD,Inc. v. Zeidenberg,908 F. Supp. at 655,38 U.S.P.Q.2d at 1524(W.D. Wis. 1996).

共引文献128

同被引文献57

  • 1邵忠银.技术措施及其规避与私力救济[J].广西青年干部学院学报,2007,17(5):59-61. 被引量:2
  • 2刘勤,刘青.著作权公共领域理论及其在图书馆信息服务中的应用[J].图书馆建设,2009(8):8-12. 被引量:4
  • 3莫万友.论拆封合同[J].时代法学,2005,3(4):98-101. 被引量:3
  • 4冯晓青.著作权法中的公共领域理论[J].湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2006,30(1):143-148. 被引量:17
  • 5半田正夫,纹谷畅男.著作权法50讲[M].魏启学,译.北京:法律出版社,1990:324.
  • 6Jonathan Riehards. Google: we don't know how to make money from YouTube. Times of London. 2008.6.12.
  • 7Warner Music Group and YouTube Announce Landmark Video Distribution and Revenue Partnership. 2006.9.18. http://investors.wmg.com/ phoenix.zhtml?c= 182480&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=906153.
  • 8CBS and YouTube Strike Strategic Content and Advertising Partnership, 2006.10.6. http://www.cbscorporation.com/newsarticle.php?id=23http:// www.thefutoncritic.com/news/2006/10/09/cbs-and-youtube-strike-strategiccontent-and-advertising-parmership-22498/20061009cbs01/.
  • 9YouTube, Universal Music Group and YouTube Forge Strategic Partnership 2006.10.9. http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/universal- music-group-andyoutube-forge-trategic-partnership-697518.htm.
  • 10YouTube, Sony BMG Music Entertainment Signs Content License Agreement with YouTube 2006.10.6. http://www.marketwire.com/press- reease/sny-bmgmusic-entertainment-signs-c~ntent-~icense-agreement-with-y~utube-697542.htm.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部