期刊文献+

基于企业类型差异的首席信息官职位权力分析

Analysis of CIOs′ Position Power Based on Different Types of Enterprises
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在界定首席信息官职位权力概念的基础上,本文采用规范的比较性案例研究方法,探讨了国有企业CIO弱权状况的主要原因,认为国有企业CIO和私营企业CIO具有相同类型的法定权力。在系统实施的特殊时期,私营企业的CIO被授予惩罚权,但国有企业的CIO没有被授予惩罚权;两种类型企业的CIO都没有奖赏权;国有企业的CIO在法定权力方面明显表现为弱权状况,而私营企业的CIO被授予应有的法定权力。造成国有企业CIO弱权状况的主要原因是信息化政策和法规的行业特殊性,CIO在行业内较低的知名度,以及企业信息化水平与行业内标杆企业的较大差距。 After giving the definition of CIOs′ position power and normatively conducting comparative case studies,this papaer analyzes the key reasons for weak-power condition of CIOs from state-owned enterprises and draws the conclusion that CIOs from state-owned and private enterprises have the same types of legitimate power.In the special period of information system implementation,CIOs from private enterpises are awarded punishment power,but not for CIOs from state-owned enterprises.All CIOs from these two types of enterprises have no reward power.CIOs′ legitimate power is in weak condition in state-owned enterprises.The main reasons for CIOs′ weak-power condition in state-owned enterprises are special informational regulations in different industries,low reputation of CIOs,and significant difference in informational level between interviewed enterprises and benchmarking enterprises in the same industry.
出处 《商业研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第12期7-12,共6页 Commercial Research
基金 国家自然科学基金项目 项目编号:71002033 70928001
关键词 首席信息官 职位权力 案例研究 国有企业 私营企业 chief inforamtion officer position power case research state-owned enterprise private-owned enterprise
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献22

  • 1Synnott W.R.,Gruber W.H.Information resource management-opportunities and strategies for the 1980s [M].New York:John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1981:11-30.
  • 2Synnott W.R.The information weapon:winning customers and markets with technology[M].New York:John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1987.75-80.
  • 3Earl M. J.The chief information officer:an analysis of survival[M].London:Center for Research in Information Management of London Business School, 1993.7-10.
  • 4Feeny D F.Understanding the CEO/CIO relationship[J].MIS Quarterly December, 1992,16(4):435-448.
  • 5Petter Gottschalk.The chief information officer:a study of managerial roles in Norway[A].Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences[C], 2002.
  • 6Leslie D.Ball.CIO on center stage:9/11 change everything[J].Information Systems Management, 2002,19(2):8-11.
  • 7Reich B.H.,Nelson K.M.In their own words:CIO visions about the future of in-house IT organizations[J].DATA BASE for Advance in Information Systems, 2003,34(4):28-44.
  • 8Enns H.G.,Huff S.L.,Golden B.R.CIO influence behaviors:the impact of technical background[J].Information & Management, 2003,40(5):467-485.
  • 9Enns H.G.,Huff S.L.,Higgins C.A.CIO lateral influence behaviors:gaining peer′s commitment to strategic information systems[J].MIS Quarterly, 2003,27(1):155-175.
  • 10Alice M.Johnson,Albert L.Lederer.Two predictors of CEO/CIO convergence[A].Philadelphia.SIGMIS Conference[C], 2003.

共引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部