摘要
在界定首席信息官职位权力概念的基础上,本文采用规范的比较性案例研究方法,探讨了国有企业CIO弱权状况的主要原因,认为国有企业CIO和私营企业CIO具有相同类型的法定权力。在系统实施的特殊时期,私营企业的CIO被授予惩罚权,但国有企业的CIO没有被授予惩罚权;两种类型企业的CIO都没有奖赏权;国有企业的CIO在法定权力方面明显表现为弱权状况,而私营企业的CIO被授予应有的法定权力。造成国有企业CIO弱权状况的主要原因是信息化政策和法规的行业特殊性,CIO在行业内较低的知名度,以及企业信息化水平与行业内标杆企业的较大差距。
After giving the definition of CIOs′ position power and normatively conducting comparative case studies,this papaer analyzes the key reasons for weak-power condition of CIOs from state-owned enterprises and draws the conclusion that CIOs from state-owned and private enterprises have the same types of legitimate power.In the special period of information system implementation,CIOs from private enterpises are awarded punishment power,but not for CIOs from state-owned enterprises.All CIOs from these two types of enterprises have no reward power.CIOs′ legitimate power is in weak condition in state-owned enterprises.The main reasons for CIOs′ weak-power condition in state-owned enterprises are special informational regulations in different industries,low reputation of CIOs,and significant difference in informational level between interviewed enterprises and benchmarking enterprises in the same industry.
出处
《商业研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第12期7-12,共6页
Commercial Research
基金
国家自然科学基金项目
项目编号:71002033
70928001
关键词
首席信息官
职位权力
案例研究
国有企业
私营企业
chief inforamtion officer
position power
case research
state-owned enterprise
private-owned enterprise