期刊文献+

全球文明史互动发展的澳门范式--论澳门学的学术可能性 被引量:1

Macao's Paradigm of Global Civilization History in an Interactional Development:on the Academic Possibility of Macao Studies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 澳门作为近500年西学东渐和东学西传的独木桥,以及东西方各种宗教、文化交汇碰撞之地,在西方走向中国、中国连接世界的大航海时代扮演了极为重要的角色。澳门研究在通向重新认知甚至改写中国乃至世界近代历史的学术努力中,应形成与敦煌学等相媲美甚至更具现实优势的澳门学。澳门学作为一种独立的学问,须以澳门深厚的历史及其研究为基础,建构以澳门历史和社会现实为核心内容同时又能丰富世界历史认知的知识系统,揭示出人类文明进程中的澳门图式及其学术范式,从而为人类文明的发展乃至世界和平的进程提供有价值的参照。 Just like a single-plank bridge for the western knowledge spread to the east and the eastern knowledge transmitted to the west in the last 500 years,Macao played a very important role in connecting China with the world and giving convenience for the western people came to China,being a place where various religions and cultures came together,conflicted and mixed together.The studies of Macao are endeavoring to re-recognize and even rewrite the history of modern China and that of the modern world,and should become a discipline comparable to and more practical than the Dunhuang Studies.As an independent discipline,the studies of Macao take the profound history and research of Macao as it self's foundation,in order to construct a knowledge system involved Macao's history and social reality as its core and being able to enrich the cognition of the world history,so as to reveal the academic paradigm of Macao in the developmental process of human civilization and provide a valuable reference for the development of human civilization and the peace of the world.
出处 《学术研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第12期1-10,159,共10页 Academic Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1田明曜.重修香山县志(卷22)[M].
  • 2J. E. Wills. Embassies and Illusions: Dutch and Portuguese Envoys to K'ang-hsi, 1666-1687 {M] . Harvard Universitv Press, 1984.
  • 3清·印光任,张汝霖.官守篇[A].澳门记略(卷上)[M].
  • 4Glyndwr William. Documents Relating to Anson's Voyange Round the World, 1740-1744 [M]. London: Navy Records Society, 1967.
  • 5刘芳辑,章文钦校.清代澳门中丈档案汇编(上册)[Z].澳门基金会,1999.
  • 6梁廷枬.粤海关志(卷29)[M].广州:广东人民出版社,2002.
  • 7姜亮夫.敦煌学之文书研究[A].北京大学中国中古史研究中心编.敦煌吐鲁番文献研究论集(第2辑)[C].北京:北京大学出版社.1983.
  • 8Thomas S. Kuhn. The Structure of Scientific Revolution [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.
  • 9Dudley Shapere. The Structure of Sceintific Revolution [J]. Philosophical Review, LXXIII 1964.
  • 10[美]萨缪尔·亨廷顿.文明的冲突与世界秩序的重建[M].周琪等译.北京:新华出版社,2001.

共引文献16

同被引文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部