摘要
"证券、期货市场的正常管理秩序"可以作为内幕交易罪的客体内容,而"投资者的合法权益"与"证券信息保密"则不宜作为内幕交易罪的客体内容。"不作为型内幕交易"本身就是一个矛盾性提法,它包含着"不作为"与"内幕交易"的"作为"的对立。"证券交易内幕信息的知情人员"非法获取证券交易内幕信息的人员"间接故意不能构成内幕交易罪;"牟取非法利益的目的"不宜视为内幕交易罪的主观要件;由于"确定故意"未能将直接故意与间接故意区分开,因而在内幕交易罪主观要件中就不宜适用"确定故意"来表述。
"The normal management order of securities and futures markets " can be the objective contents of the insider trading crime. But the "legitimate rights and interests of investors" and "securities information confidentiality" is not appropriate for the objective contents of the insider trading crime. "The insider trading of nonfeasance type" is in itself a contradiction of the formulation, which contains the opposition of "nonfeasance" and "insider trading". "The informed persons of inside information in securities trading" and "persons illegal access to securities trading inside information" belong to indirect intention, which doesn't constitute the crime of insider trading. "The purpose to obtain illegal benefits" should not be regarded as the subjective element of the crime of insider trading. Due to "sure intentionally" fails to distinguish direct and indirect intention, it is not applicable to formulate "sure intentionally" in the subjective element of the insider trading crime.
出处
《江西科技师范学院学报》
2011年第5期20-25,共6页
Journal of Nanchang Vocational & Technical Techers' College
关键词
内幕交易罪
不作为
内幕信息
间接故意
insider trading crime
nonfeasance
inside information
indirect intent