期刊文献+

磁共振弥散加权成像评价肝硬化程度的初步研究 被引量:4

Preliminary study of MR diffusion weighted imaging in evaluating the degree of liver cirrhosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨肝脏弥散加权成像表观弥散系数值(apparent diffusion coefficients,ADC)评价肝硬化患者肝功能的临床应用价值。方法对95例受检者行DWI检查,正常对照组35例,肝硬化组60例,其中Child-Pugh分级A级、B级28例,为肝硬化AB组,Child-Pugh分级C级32例,为肝硬化C组。测量所有受检者肝脏ADC值,比较三组间ADC值差异。结果正常对照组肝脏ADC值为(1.28±0.14)×10-3mm2/s,肝硬化AB组和C组ADC值分别为(1.18±0.17)×10-3mm2/s和(0.91±0.34)×10-3mm2/s,肝硬化AB组和正常对照组无统计学差异(P=0.069),肝硬化C组和肝硬化AB组、肝硬化C组和正常对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.000,P=0.000)。结论肝硬化患者肝纤维化程度越重,ADC值越小。ADC值在一定程度上能够反映肝硬化程度。 Objective: To investigate the value of MR diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) in patients with liver cirrhosis. Materials and Methods: Ninety-five cases (35 healthy volunteers and 60 patients with liver cirrhosis) were recruited with their apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) of liver analyzed. According to liver Child-Pugh classification, 60 patients with liver cirrhosis were classified into group AB (28 cases) and group C (32 cases) with their ADC measured and compared intra-group and with that of the volunteers. Results: The ADC values of the control group, group AB and group C were (1.28±0.14)×10-3 mm2/s, (1.18±0.17)×10-3 mm2/s, and (0.91±0.34)×10-3 mm2/s, respectively. The difference was significant between group C and group AB and group C and control group (P=0.000, P=0.000), respectively. There was no statistical significance between group AB and control group (P=0.069). Conclusions: The value of ADC decreased as the aggravation of the hepatic cirrhosis. To some extent, the ADC value may reflect the degree of liver cirrhosis.
出处 《磁共振成像》 CAS 2011年第6期413-415,共3页 Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
基金 北京卫生系统高层次卫生技术人才培养计划项目(编号:2009-3-55)资助
关键词 磁共振成像 肝硬化 弥散加权成像 CHILD-PUGH分级 Magnetic resonance imaging Live cirrhosis Diffusion weighted imaging Child-Pugh classification
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献13

  • 1Shu-Sen Zheng, Zhi-Yong Yu, Ting-Bo Liang, Wei-Lin Wang, Yan Shen, Min Zhang, Xiao Xu and Jian Wu Hangzhou, China Centre of Organ Transplantation and Department o Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Medica College, Zhcjiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China.Prevention and treatment of hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation[J].Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International,2004,3(1):21-25. 被引量:18
  • 2Bing-Hui Yang, Jing-Lin Xia, Li-Wen Huang, Zhao-You Tang, Ming-Shan Chen, Jin-Qing Li, An-Min Liang, Qin-Guo Mo, Hui-Shan Lu, Chao-Liu Dai, Lu-Nan Yan, Zhi-Jian Yu, Rong-Sheng Rao, Le-Qun Li, Zhi-Xiong Su, Zhuang-Wei Fang Shanghai, China Liver Cancer Institute & Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China,Tumor Hospital, Zhongshan University, Guangzhou 510000, China Tumor Hospital, Guangxi Medical Universi- ty, Nanning 530000, China,Xiehe Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350000, China,Second Hos- pital, Chinese Medical University, Shenyang 110000, China ,Huaxi Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China ,Hospital Affiliated to Nantong Medical University, Nantong 226000 , China,Second Hospital, Jiangxi Medical University, Nanchang 330000 , China ,First Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530000 , China ,People’s Hospital of Hainan Province, Haikou 570000, China.Changed clinical aspects of primary liver cancer in China during the past 30 years[J].Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International,2004,3(2):194-198. 被引量:20
  • 3Yi Pan, Zhao-Ming Wang, Ling-Jun Mou, Xiao-Dong Teng, Zhou-Jun Zheng and Li-Xiong Ying Hangzhou, ChinaDepartments of Pathology ,and General Surgery ,First Affilia- ted Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China.Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: pathological analysis of 11 cases[J].Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International,2004,3(2):199-203. 被引量:3
  • 4[1]Okada Y, Ohtomo K, Kiryu S, et al. Breath-hold T2-weighted MRI of hepatic tumors: value of echo planar imaging with diffusion-sensitizing gradient[J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 1998, 22(3):364.
  • 5[2]Ichikawa T, Haradome H, Hachiya J, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with single-shot echo-planar sequences: detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions[J]. AJR, 1998, 170(2):397.
  • 6[3]Yamashita Y, Tang Y, Takahashi M, et al. Ultrafast MR imaging of the abdomen: echo planar imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 1998, 8(2):367.
  • 7[4]Namimoto T, Yamashita Y, Sumi S, et al. Characterization of focal liver masses with diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging[J]. Radiology, 1997, 204(3):739.
  • 8[5]Yamada I, Aung W, Himeno Y, et al. Diffusion coefficients in abdominal organs and hepatic lesions: Evaluation with intravoxel incoherent motion echo-planar MR imaging[J]. Radiology, 1999, 210(3):617.
  • 9[6]Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, et al. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging[J]. Radiology, 1988, 168(2):497.
  • 10[7]Tuner R, Le Bihan D, Maier J, et al. Echo-planar imaging of intravoxel incoherent motion[J]. Radiology, 1990, 177(2):407.

共引文献138

同被引文献30

引证文献4

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部