期刊文献+

合作主义语境下我国工资集体协商制度建设 被引量:4

Construction of wage collective consultation institution under collaborationism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国劳动报酬持续走低的根本原因在于缺乏平等博弈的工资集体协商制度。工资集体协商制度体现了现代工业社会对合作主义的必然要求。现代工业社会的合作是组织化的合作,承认私利的独立性,但不主张绝对的私利,而是自治与权威的统一。我国工资集体协商制度建设具有工会组织连续存在的组织基础、国家权威和社会各阶层合作和协商的丰富经验和思想基础,但同时存在工会依附性和行政化倾向、市民社会发育不全及微观的经济的合作和协商不足的挑战。应通过组建行业工会,改革和完善工会体系;整合社会资源,培育自治性行业雇主组织;积极转变职能,有效发挥政府作用,建设符合中国国情的工资集体协商制度。 The fact that fundamental reason for remuneration of labor has dropped in constantly in our country lies in lacking wage collective consultation institution with equal gaming.Wage collective consultation institution symbolizes that modern industry society asks for collaborationism.Collaboration in modern industrial society is an organized one,admitting selfish interests′ independence but not standing for absolute selfish interests,and it is union of autonomy and authority.Construction of wage collective consultation institution in our country has advantages in organization basis of trade union's persistent existence,state authority,and rich experiences and thought basis of society collaboration and consultation at all levels.At the same time,it is faced with grave challenges in trade union's dependence and administrative tendency,civil society's undergrowth and deficiency of microcosmic and economic collaboration and consultation.We should construct wage collective consultation institution in conformity with China's concrete conditions by means of setting up industry union,reforming and perfecting union system,integrating social resources,fostering autonomic industry employer's organization,and actively changing the functions and effectively so as to give play to the government.
作者 易重华
出处 《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2011年第6期5-10,共6页 Journal of Central South University:Social Sciences
基金 国家社科基金重大项目<战后西方发达国家市场经济理论 政策和制度架构变迁及其借鉴>(05&ZD005)
关键词 合作主义 自治 权威 行业 工资集体协商制度 collaborationism autonomy authority industry wage collective consultation institution
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献48

  • 1周长城,陈群.集体谈判:建立合作型劳资关系的有效战略[J].社会科学研究,2004(4):80-83. 被引量:27
  • 2全球治理委员会.我们的全球伙伴关系[M].牛津大学出版社,1995.23.
  • 3.《江泽民七一讲话》[N].《人民日报》,2001年7月.
  • 4马秋莎. Classification, Regulation, and Managerial Structure: A Preliminary Inquire of the Governance of Chinese NGOs, in S. Hasan and M. Lyons. Social Capital in Asian Sustainable Development Management: Examples and Lessons, New York: Nova Science Publishers. 2004, p. 23.
  • 5D.L. McNamara. Comparative Corporatism, in D. L. McNamara ed. , Corporatism and Korean Capitalism, London..Routledge. 1999, p. 9.
  • 6P.C. Schmitter. Corporatism as Organizational Practice and Political Theory, in W. M. Lafferty and E. Rosenstein,International Handbook of Participation in Organizations, New York: Oxford University Press. 1993, p. 327.
  • 7P.C. Sehmitter. Still the Century of Corporatism? in F. B. Pike and T. Striteh (eds.), The New Corporatism : Social-Political Structures in the Iberian World, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. 1974, pp. 93 -94.
  • 8J. Unger and A. Chan, China, Corporatism, and the East Asian Model, The Australian Journal of Chinese S f fairs, vol. 33. 1995, pp. 31 - 32.
  • 9H.J. Wiarda. Corporatism and Comparative Politics:The Other Great " Ism', Armonk, NY:M.E. Sharp. 1997.
  • 10Schmitter. International Handbook of Participation in Organizations, p. 327.

同被引文献36

引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部