期刊文献+

大气环流模式在松花江流域的适用性评价 被引量:7

Assessment on Performance of Different General Circulation Models in Songhuajiang River Basin
下载PDF
导出
摘要 不同GCMs的输出变量在区域上的表现差异较大。以11个统计特征量为基础,构建了基于秩评分的评价方法,分别对比分析了21个GCMs的17个输出变量在松花江流域与ERA-40再分析资料的吻合程度,以秩评分进行了定量评价。结果显示:不同GCMs对高空气象变量的模拟表现与地面气候要素的模拟表现并不一致,IPSL:CM4、GISS:ER、HadCM3和CSIRO:MK30在松花江流域高空气象变量模拟方面表现相对较好,而CSIRO:MK30、CGCM3.1_T63、GFDL:CM21和BCCR:BCM20在地面气候要素的模拟方面表现相对较好。综合评分结果显示,IPSL:CM4、CSIRO:MK30、GISS:ER和BCCR:CM20在松花江流域的综合表现相对较好。 There are great differences in the regional outputs from different GCMs. With the combination of 11 statistical characteristics, a score-based muhi-criteria method was developed to assess /he performance of 21 GCMs with 5 climatic variables (air temperature, relative humidity, zonal wind speed, meridian wind speed, geopotential height) at 3 high-altitudes (850hPa, 700hPa, 500hPa) and precipitation, air temperature in the Songhuajiang River Basin. The results show that there is not consistency for GCMs' performance between high-altitude variables and ground climatic variables, IPSL:CM4, GISS:ER, HadCM3 and CSIRO: MK30 show relatively better performance for high-altitude meteorological variables, while CSIRO:MK30, CGCM3.1_T63, GFDL:CM21 and BCCR:BCM20 show relatively better performance for ground climatic variables in the Songhuajiang River Basin. Comprehen- sive assessment shows that the GCMs with relatively better performance in the Songhuajiang River Basin are IPSL:CM4, CSIRO: MK30, GISS:ER and BCCR:CM20.
出处 《水文》 CSCD 北大核心 2011年第6期24-31,共8页 Journal of China Hydrology
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)“气候变化对我国东部季风区陆地水循环与水资源安全的影响及适应对策”(2010CB428400)
关键词 GCMS ERA-40 适用性 松花江 GCMs ERA-40 adaptability Songhuajiang River
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1林而达,许吟隆,蒋金荷,李玉娥,杨修,张建云,李从先,吴绍洪,赵宗群,吴建国,居辉,严昌荣,王守荣,刘允芬,杜碧兰,赵成义,秦保芳,刘春蓁,黄朝迎,张小全,马世铭.气候变化国家评估报告(Ⅱ):气候变化的影响与适应[J].气候变化研究进展,2006,2(2):51-56. 被引量:257
  • 2IPCC. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis[A]. In: Solomon S., Qin D., Manning M., et al. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change[C]. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  • 3Dessai S., Hulme M..Assessing the robustness of adaptation deci- sions to climate change uncertainties: A case study on water re- sources management in the east of England [J]. Global Environmen- tal Change, 2007(17): 59-72.
  • 4Giorgi F., Mearns L. O..Calculation of average, uncertainty range and reliability of regional climate changes from AOGCM simulations via the "reliability ensemble averaging" (REA) method[J]. Journal of Climate, 2002(15): 1141-1158.
  • 5Lambert S. J., Boer G. J..CMIP1 evaluation and intercomparison of coupled climate models[J]. Climate Dynamics, 2001(17): 83-106.
  • 6Perkins S. E., Pitman A. J., Holbrook N. J., et al. Evaluation of the AR4 climate models' simulated daily maximum temperature, minimum temperature, and precipitation over Australia using probability density functions[J]. Journal of Climate, 2007(20): 4356-4376.
  • 7Murphy J. M., Sexton D. H., Barnett D. N., et al. Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change sim- ulations [J]. Nature, 2004(430): 768-772.
  • 8徐影,丁一汇,赵宗慈.近30年人类活动对东亚地区气候变化影响的检测与评估[J].应用气象学报,2002,13(5):513-525. 被引量:82
  • 9曹颖,张光辉.大气环流模式在黄河流域的适用性评价[J].水文,2009,29(5):1-5. 被引量:14
  • 10谢安,孙永罡,白人海.中国东北近50年干旱发展及对全球气候变暖的响应[J].地理学报,2003,58(z1):75-82. 被引量:107

二级参考文献137

共引文献879

同被引文献94

引证文献7

二级引证文献87

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部