摘要
目的比较全麻非心脏手术患者羟乙基淀粉(HES)130/0.4电解质注射液与HES130/0.4氯化钠溶液容量治疗的效果。方法择期全麻非心脏外科手术(神经外科手术除外)患者242例,年龄18~64岁,体重指数18~29kg/m2,性别不限,ASA分级Ⅰ或Ⅱ级,采用随机数字表法,将患者随机分为试验组和对照组:麻醉诱导后经1h静脉输注6%HES130/0.4电解质注射液或6%HES130/0.4氯化钠溶液15ml/kg。于HES输注前和输注结束后15min时取动脉血样,行血气分析,记录pH值、BE、HCO3、电解质(K+、Na+、Cl+、Mg2+);测定Hct、Hb、血液生化指标(ALT、AST、Cr、BUN和血糖)、凝血功能指标,记录电解质和血液生化指标异常有临床意义的发生情况、血管活性药物的使用情况,与研究药物有关不良事件(凝血酶原时间延长、活化部分凝血活酶时间延长和高氯血症)的发生情况和术中液体出人量。结果试验组和对照组最终完成91例和95例。两组液体用量和尿量比较差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。与对照组比较,试验组输注结束后15min时pH值、BE、HCO3-、K+、Mg2+升高,Na+、Cl-降低(P〈0.05),Hb和Hct差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);与输注前比较,输注结束后15rain时对照组BE、HCO3-、Mg2+、Hb和Hct降低,Cl-升高,试验组Na+、Mg2+、Hb和Hct降低,Cl-升高(P〈0.05)。试验组血钾、血氯异常有临床意义的发生率明显低于对照组(P〈O.05)。两组血管活性药物使用率、与研究药物有关的不良事件发生率、生化指标异常有临床意义的发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论与6%HES130/0.4氯化钠溶液比较,6%HES130/0.4电解质注射漓扩容效能无尊异.侣能更好地维持机体电解质和酸碱平衡。
Objective To compare the plasma volume expanding effect of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.4 and electrolyte solution (E-HES) and HES 130/0.4 and normal saline (NS-HES) in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery under general anesthesia. Methods A multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial was conducted. Two hundred and forty-two ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱpatients aged 18-64 yr with body mass index 18-29 kg/m2 undergoing noncardiac surgery were randomly divided into 2 groups: group E-HES and group NS-HES. E-HES and NS-HES 15 ml/kg was infused iv over 1 h immediately after induction of anesthesia in groups E-HES and NS-HES respectively. Arterial blood samples were taken before (baseline) and at 15 min after the end of HES infusion for blood gas analysis (pH value, BE, HCO3- , K+ , Na+ , Cl- , Mg2+ ) and measurement of Hb, Hct, blood chemistry (ALT, AST, Cr, BUN, Glu) and coagulation function. The electrolyte abnormality, requirement for vasopressor, treatment-related adverse effects (prolonged protbrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time and hyperchloremia) and fluid balance were recorded. Results Of the 242 patients, 122 received E-HES and 120 received NS-HES. Ninety-one patients in group E-HES and 95 in group NS-HES completed the trial. The pH value, BE, HCO3 - , K+ , and Mg2+ were significantly higher and Na+ and Cl- lower at 15 min after HES infusion was finished in group E-HES than in group NS-HES. BE, HCO3- , Na+ , Mg2+ , Hb and Hct were significantly decreased while Cl- was significantly increased in group NS-HES while Na2+ , Mg2+ , Hb and Hct were significantly decreased and Cl- was increased in group E-HES at 15 min after HES infusion as compared with the baseline values before infusion. The incidence of clinical significant abnormality in plasma K+ and Cl- was significantly lower in group E-HES than in group NS-HES. There were no significant differences in Hb, Hct, urine output, amount of HES infused, vasopressor requirement, the incidence of clinically significant abnormality in blood chemistry and treatment-related adverse effects between the 2 groups. Conclusion E-HES and NS-HES have the same plasma volume expanding effect, but E-HES maintains better electrolyte and acid-base balance than NS-HES.
出处
《中华麻醉学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2011年第10期1165-1169,共5页
Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology
关键词
羟乙基淀粉
电解质
氯化钠
补液疗法
Hetastarch
Electrolytes
Sodium chloride
Fluid therapy