期刊文献+

右美托咪啶复合靶控输注异丙酚时舒芬太尼抑制双腔气管插管反应的量效关系 被引量:11

Dose-response relationship of sufentanil blunting responses to double-lumen endotracheal intubation when combined dexmedetomidine and propofol by target-controlled infusion
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的确定右美托咪啶复合靶控输注(TCI)异丙酚时舒芬太尼抑制双腔气管插管反应的效应室靶浓度(EC50和EC95)。方法单肺通气全麻胸外科手术患者30例,ASA分级Ⅱ或Ⅱ级,年龄40—64岁,体重指数〈30kg/m2。经10min静脉输注右美托咪啶0.6μg/kg,随后以0.3μg·kg-1·h-1的速率维持至手术结束前30min。TCI舒芬太尼3min后TCI异丙酚,Ce3μg/ml,意识消失时静脉注射罗库溴铵0.8mg/kg行双腔气管插管。采用序贯法进行试验,TCI舒芬太尼初始Ce0.3ng/ml,如果前一例患者发生气管插管反应,则下一例患者采用高一级浓度,否则采用低一级浓度,相邻靶浓度之间比率为1.1。气管插管反应的标准:气管插管后3min内MAP波动幅度超过基础水平15%和,或HR〉90次/min。采用概率单位回归分析法计算舒芬太尼抑制双腔气管插管反应的EC50和EC50结果舒芬太尼抑制双腔气管插管反应的EC50为0.23ng/ml,其95%可信区间为0.20—0.26ng/ml;抑制双腔气管插管反应的EC95为0.26ng/ml,其95%可信区间为0.24~0.31ng/ml。结论右美托咪啶复合TCI异丙酚时,舒芬太尼抑制双腔气管插管反应的EC50和EC95分别为0.23和0.26ng/ml。 Objective To determine-the target effect-site concentration (ECs0 and EC95 ) of sufentanil blunting the responses to double-lumen endotracheal intubation when combined dexmedetomidine and propofol by target-controlled infusion (TCI) .Methods Thirty ASA Ⅰor Ⅱ patients aged 40-64 yr with body mass index 〈 30 kg/m2 undergoing thoracic surgery under general anesthesia. Dexmedetomidine 0.6 μg/kg was infused iv over 10 rain followed by continuous iv infusion at 0.3 μg·kg-1·h-1until 30 rain before the end of operation. The initial target effectsite concentration of sufentanil was set at0. 3 ng/ml, and the ratio of two consecutive effectsite concentrations was 1.1. Propofol was administered by TCI at an effect-site concentration of 3 μg/ml. When the patients lost eoneiousness, roeuronium 0.8 mg/kg was administrated. The responses to double-lumen endotracheal intubation was defined as the increase in MAP≥ 15 % of the baseline values and/or HR 〉 90 bpm within 3 rain after tracheal intubation. The ECs0 and ECgs (95% confidence interval) of snfentanil blunting the responses to double-lumen endotracheal intubation were calculated by Probit analysis. Results The ECs0 and EC95 of snfentanil blunting the responses to double-lumen endotracheal intubation were 0.23 ng/ml (95% CI 0.20-0.26 ng/ml) and 0.26 ng/ml (950/o CI 0.24-0.31 ng/ml). Conclusion The EC50 and EC95 of snfentanil blunting the responses to double-lumen endotracheal intubation when combined dexmedetomidine and propofol by TCI are 0.23 and 0.26 ng/ml respectively.
出处 《中华麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第10期1210-1212,共3页 Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology
关键词 舒芬太尼 右美托咪啶 二异丙酚 插管法 气管内 剂量效应关系 药物 药物释放系统 Sufentanil Dexmedetomidine Propofol Intubation, intratracheal Dose-response relationship, drug Drug delivery systems
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Thomson IR, Henderson BT, Singh K, et al. Concentration-response relationships for fentanyl and sufentanil in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Anesthesiology,1998,89(4) :852-861.
  • 2彭章龙,于布为.舒芬太尼和芬太尼用于冠脉搭桥手术麻醉诱导的血液动力学变化[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2004,24(3):218-219. 被引量:70
  • 3Ebert TJ, Ficke DJ,Arain SR,et al. Vasodilation from sufentanil in humans. Anesth Analg,2005(6) : 1677-1680.
  • 4Elliott C. Manual of Bacterial Plant Pathogens, ed2 [M]. Chronica Botanica Waltham, 1951.
  • 5Duveiller E, Fucikovsky L, Rudolph K, et al. The Bacterial Diseases of Wheat[A]: Concepts and Methods of Disease Management[C]. Mexico D F: CIMMYT, 1997.
  • 6Krieg N R, Holt J G. Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology I [M]. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore. 1984.
  • 7胡宪文,张野,孔令锁,翁立军,蒋玲玲,李云.不同剂量右美托咪啶抑制气管插管诱发患者心血管反应效应的比较[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2010,30(11):1304-1306. 被引量:178

二级参考文献14

  • 1Kanaidel M,Fukusakil M,Tamural S,et al.Hemodynamic and catecholamine responses during tracheal intubation using a lightwand device (Trachlight) in elderly patients with hypertension.J Anesth,2003,17(3):161-165.
  • 2Yoo KY,Jeong SW,Kim SJ,et al.Cardiovascular responses to endotracheal intubation in patients with acute and chronic spinal cord injuries.Anesth Analg,2003,97(4):1162-1167.
  • 3Kunisawa T,Nagata O,Nagashima M,et al.Dexmedetomidine suppresses the decrease in blood pressure during anesthetic induction and blunts the cardiovascular response to tracheal intubation,J Clin Anesth,2009,21(3):194-199.
  • 4Adachi YU,Takamatsu I,Watanabe K,et al.Evaluation of the cardiovascular responses to fiberoptic orotracheal intubation with television monitoring:comparison with conventional direct laryngoscopy.J Clin Anesth,2000,12(7):503-508.
  • 5Chrysostomou C,Schmitt CG.Dexmedetomidine:sedation,analgesia and beyond.Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol,2008,4(5):619-627.
  • 6Bekker AY,Basile J,Gold M,et al.Dexmedetomidine for awake carotid endarterectomy:efficacy,hemodynamic profile,and side effects.J Neurosurg.Anesthesiol,2004,16(2):126-135.
  • 7Ahonen J, Olkkola KT, Hynynen M, et al.Comparison of alfentanil, fentanyl and sufentanil for total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Br J Anaesth, 2000,85:533-540.
  • 8Thomson IR, Harding G, Hudson RJ. A comparison of fentanyl and sufentanil in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2000 ,14:652-656.
  • 9Bovill JG, Sebel PS, Blackburn CL, et al. The pharmacokinetics of sufentanil in surgical patients. Anesthesiology, 1984,61:502-506.
  • 10Stahl KD, Van Bever W, Janssen P, et al. Receptor affinity and phar ̄macological potency of a series of narcotic analgesic anti-diarrheal and neuroleptic drugs. Eur J Pharmacol, 1977, 46:199-205.

共引文献246

同被引文献105

  • 1王伶俐,肖少华.双腔管法行单肺通气麻醉时临床常见的问题[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2011,5(8):2328-2329. 被引量:12
  • 2徐加刚,张月明,王绍明,李衍森,辛秀英.舒芬太尼和芬太尼对患者气管插管心血管反应抑制效应的比较[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2007,27(8):765-766. 被引量:58
  • 3Yoo KY, Jeong CW, Kim WM, et al. Cardiovascular and arousal re- sponses to single-lumen endotracheal and double-lumen endobronchi- al intubation in the normotensive and hypertensive elderly[ J ]. Kore- an J Anesthesiol, 2011,60(2) :90-97.
  • 4Maguire A, Thompson JP, Guest C, et al. Comparison of the effects of intravenous alfentanil and esmolol on the cardiovascular response to double-lumen endobronchial intubation [ J]. Anaesthesia, 2001, 56(4) :319-325.
  • 5Sun S, Huang SQ. Effects of pretreatment with a small dose of dexmedetomidine on sufentanil-induced cough during anesthetic in- duction [ J ]. J Anesth, 2013,27 ( 1 ) :25 -28.
  • 6Hu LG, Pan JH, Li J, et al. Effects of differem doses of sufentanil and remifentanil combined with propofol in target-controlled infusion on stress reaction in elderly patients[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2013,5 (3) :807-812.
  • 7Yeganeh N, Roshani B, Latifi H, et al. Comparison of target-con- trolled infusion of sufentanil and remifentanil in blunting hemody- namic response to tracheal intubation [ J ]. J Inj Violence Res, 2013, 5(2) :101-107.
  • 8Hu LG, Pan JH, Li J, et al. Effects of different doses of sufentanil and remifentanil combined with propofol in target-controlled infusion on stress reaction in elderly patients[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2013,5 (3) :807-812.
  • 9Ebert TJ, Fieke DJ, Arain SR, et al. Vasodilation from sufentanil in humans[J]. Anesth Analg, 2005,101 (6) :1677-1680.
  • 10Cecconi M, Corredor C, Arulkumaran N, et al. Clinical review: Goal-directed therapy-what is the evidence in surgical patients? The effect on different risk groups[J]. Crit Care, 2013,17(2) :209.

引证文献11

二级引证文献79

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部