期刊文献+

基于矩形窄缝通道实验数据的DNB机理模型评价 被引量:1

DNB Mechanistic Model Assessment Based on Experimental Data in Narrow Rectangular Channel
下载PDF
导出
摘要 偏离泡核沸腾(DNB)对于压水堆安全具有重要意义。已有机理模型能否适用于矩形窄缝通道缺乏足够的实验验证。本文基于矩形窄缝通道实验数据,对微液层蒸干模型和汽泡壅塞模型两类DNB机理模型进行了计算评价。结果显示:汽泡壅塞模型适用范围较微液层蒸干模型宽;部分热工参数对模型计算性能有系统性影响。随空泡份额的增大,各模型的计算性能均变差,可能是通道几何差异所致。 The departure from nucleate boiling(DNB) is important concerning about the safety of a PWR.Lacking assessment by experimental data points,it's doubtful whether the existing models can be used in narrow rectangular channels or not.Based on experimental data points in narrow rectangular channels,two kinds of classical DNB models,which include liquid sublayer dryout model(LSDM) and bubble crowding model(BCM),were assessed.The results show that the BCM has much wider application range than the LSDM.Several thermal parameters show systematical influences on the calculated results by the models.The performances of all the models deteriorate as the void fraction increases.The reason may be attributed to the geometrical differences between a circular tube and narrow rectangular channel.
出处 《原子能科学技术》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第11期1317-1323,共7页 Atomic Energy Science and Technology
基金 中核集团青年科技创新团队资助项目
关键词 矩形窄缝通道 偏离泡核沸腾 模型评价 narrow rectangular channel departure from nucleate boiling model assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1FUJITA Y, OHTA H, UCHIDA S, et al. Nucleate boiling heat transfer and critical heat flux in narrow space between rectangular surface[J]. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 1988, 31(2): 229-239.
  • 2ISHIBASHI E, NISHIKAWA K. Saturated boiling heat transfer in narrow spaces[J]. Int J Heat Mass Trass, 1969, 28(1): 863-894.
  • 3LEE C H, MUDAWAR I. A mechanistic critical heat flux model for subcooled flow boiling based on local bulk flow conditions[J]. Int J Multiphase Flow, 1998, 14(6): 711-728.
  • 4KATTO Y. Prediction of critical heat flux of subcooled flow boiling in round tubes[J]. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 1990, 33(9) : 1 921-1 928.
  • 5KATTO Y. A prediction model of subcooled water flow boiling CHF for pressure in the range 0.1-20 MPa [J].Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 1992, 35(5): 1 115 1 123.
  • 6CELATA G P, CUMO M, KATTO Y, et al. Prediction of the critical heat flux in water subcooled flow boiling using a new mechanistic approach[J]. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 1999, 42 (8): 1 457-1 466.
  • 7CELATA G P, CUMO M, MARIANI A, et al. Rationalization of existing mechanistic models for the prediction of water subcooled flow boiling critical heat flux[J]. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 1994, 37(Suppl. 1): 347-360.
  • 8LIU W, NARIAI H, INASAKA F. Prediction of critical heat flux for subcooled flow boiling [J]. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 2000, 43(18): 3 371- 3 390.
  • 9WEISMAN J, PEI B S. Prediction of critical heat flux in flow boiling at low qualities[J]. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 1983, 26 (10): 1 463- 1 477.
  • 10YING S H, WEISMAN J. Prediction of the critical heat flux in flow boiling at intermediate qualities[J]. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 1986, 29 (11): 1 639-1 648.

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部