期刊文献+

中美制度均势与东亚两种体系的兼容共存 被引量:17

The Structural Balance between the U.S.and China and the Coexistence of Two East Asian Systems
原文传递
导出
摘要 东亚体系的现状是中国倡导的多边合作体系与美国主导的双边同盟体系的并存。如何解释两种体系的兼容共存以及如何实现兼容共存?文章首先引入制度均势理论,分析了冷战结束后中美两国在东亚采取的制度均势行为,认为中美制度均势为东亚两种体系的兼容共存提供了现实依据;同时,鉴于双边同盟和多边合作既存在竞争的一面,又存在共通的一面,其共通的一面为东亚两种体系的兼容共存提供了理论依据。然后,文章又在借鉴国际制度互动理论的基础上,提出了两种体系实现兼容共存的"制度嵌套交叠模式"。该模式既是基于两种体系都无法取代另一方这样一个事实,也是中美两国在东亚采取制度均势政策的结果。最后,文章讨论了中美制度均势和东亚体系兼容对中国外交政策的启示。 The current status quo in East Asia is the coexistence of a system of multilateral cooperation promoted by China and a system of bilateral alliances promoted by the United States.How do we explain and achieve compatibility and coexistence of these two systems? This article borrows from structural balance theory to analyze the structural balancing in East Asia between the U.S.and China following the Cold War.It argues that this balancing makes it possible for two systems to coexist in East Asia,and that the bilateral alliances and multilateral cooperation both compete with and complement one another.The way in which they complement one another provides theoretical evidence for the coexistence of two systems within East Asia.The article goes on to borrow from the theory of international systems to propose a "nested systems mode" of realizing the coexistence of two systems.Based on the assumption that two systems can exist when each is not capable of replacing the other,it argues that this is achieved as a result of the policies of structural balancing followed by the U.S.and China.The article closes with a discussion of foreign policy implications for China of its structural balancing with the U.S.and the coexistence of two East Asian systems.
作者 祁怀高
出处 《当代亚太》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第6期55-74,共20页 Journal of Contemporary Asia-Pacific Studies
基金 国家社会科学基金资助项目"中国快速崛起背景下周边安全挑战及周边外交战略研究"(项目编号:11CGJ002) 复旦大学亚洲研究中心资助项目的阶段性成果
关键词 制度均势 东亚体系 制度嵌套交叠模式 Structural Balance East Asian System Modes of Overlapping Systems
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1David Shambaugh, "Asia in Transition: The Evolving Regional Order", Current History, Vo1.105, No. 690, 2006, pp. 153-159.
  • 2Franeis Fukuyama, "Re-Envisioning Asia", Foreign Affairs, Vol. 84, No.l, 2005, pp. 75-87.
  • 3William Tow, Tangled Webs : Security Architectures in Asia, ASPI Strategic Report, July 2008.
  • 4Gyoosang Seol, "Bilateral Alliances and its Consequences on Northeast Asian Security Multi- lateralism", EastAsian Review, Vol. 20, No. 4, 2008, pp. 108-127.
  • 5钱文荣.《双边军事同盟与多边安全合作的关系》[J].太平洋学报,1998,:21-21.
  • 6石源华.后朝核阶段东北亚安全合作的走向[J].国际问题研究,2008(6):52-57. 被引量:7
  • 7许亮.《美韩同盟与六方会谈的兼容:一种制度主义视角分析》,复旦大学2009年博士学位论文,第163-168页.
  • 8Kai He, Institutional Balancing in the Asia Pacific : Economic Interdependence and China ' s Rise, Routledge, 2009, p. 11.
  • 9祁怀高.冷战后中美在东亚的制度均势及对中国的启示[J].世界经济与政治,2011(7):94-110. 被引量:8
  • 10"Interview With Wen Jiabao: A Complete Transcript From Chinese Premieres Meeting", The Washington Post, Nov. 21, 2003. http: //www. washingtonpost, com/ac2/wp-dyn? pagename = article& node= &eontentld= A6641-2003Nov22 &notFound = true.

二级参考文献67

  • 1梁明.日本“进军”东南亚企图何在[J].瞭望,2002(18):29-31. 被引量:1
  • 2新华社平壤2008年9月19日电.
  • 3《美国有人主张即使朝鲜拥核,也会与其建交》,韩国朝鲜日报网2007年4月6日.
  • 4金正日.《我们是有核国家,不要谈琐碎问题》,韩国《朝鲜日报》2006年11月6日.
  • 5《卢武铉:韩国若想生存,既要亲美也要亲北》,韩国《朝鲜日报》2007年3月27日.
  • 6《韩国可能无法继续半岛元核化过程中的主导权》,韩国联、合网(中文)2007年4月7日.
  • 7《美国的“北核警戒线”有所退步?》,《东亚日报》2007年3月9日.
  • 8《韩统一部长官:日本抓住绑架问题不利于六方会谈》,韩国《朝鲜日报》2007年4月7日.
  • 9Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, SIPRI Yearbook 2008 : Armaments, Disarmament and International Security ( Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2008 ) 179 - 183.
  • 10Waheguru Pal Singh Sidhu and Jing-dong Yuan, China and India: Cooperation or Conflict? (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2003 ) 79 - 103.

共引文献35

同被引文献585

引证文献17

二级引证文献306

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部