摘要
目的探讨腺苷(ADE)负荷门控心肌灌注显像(G-MPI)与双源CT冠状动脉造影(DSCTCA)诊断冠状动脉病(CAD)的价值。方法选择CAD可能性为低、中、高度的患者共53例,采用两日法行静息、腺苷负荷锝标记甲氧基异丁基异腈(99mTc-MIBI)G-MPI及DSCTCA,并于4周内进行CAG。采用美国心脏病协会17节段5分制(0~4分)目测半定量方法对MPI结果进行分析,静息与负荷评分的差值>1为可逆性缺血。DSCTCA结果采用目测直径法判断冠状动脉狭窄程度,分为:正常、狭窄<50%及狭窄程度≥50%。以CAG结果为"金标准",狭窄程度≥50%时定义为CAD,比较MPI和DSCTCA对CAD的诊断价值及两者之间的关系。结果 G-MPI和DSCTCA对CAD的诊断敏感度、特异度及准确率分别为94.44%(34/36)、52.94%(9/17)、81.13%(43/53)及88.89%(32/36)、88.24%(15/17)、88.68%(47/53)。两种检查方法差异有统计学意义(χ2=9.28,P=0.005)。结论 G-MPI和DSCTCA诊断CAD均有较高价值,联合应用可提供功能及解剖两方面的信息,提高对CAD的诊断效能。
Objective To explore the value of adenosine(ADE) stress gated myocardial perfusion imaging(G-MPI) and dual-source CT coronary angiography(DSCTCA) in diagnosis of coronary artery disease(CAD).Methods Fifty-three patients with low,medium and high probability of CAD underwent resting(REST),ADE stress G-MPI and DSCTCA,then they underwent CAG within 4 weeks.MPI results were analyzed using the American Heart Association 17 segment 5-point scale(0—4 points) visual semi-quantitative method,and the resting and stress rating of the difference 1 were identified as reversible defect.Coronary stenosis were determined using international common law of DSCTCA visual diameter and were divided into normal and stenosis 50% or ≥50%.Taking CAG results as gold standards and stenosis ≥50% defined as CAD,diagnostic value of MPI and DSCTCA was compared.Results According to CAG results,the sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of G-MPI and DSCTCA in diagnosis of CAD was 94.44%(34/36),52.94%(9/17),81.13%(43/53) and 88.89%(32/36),88.24%(15/17),88.68%(47/53),respectively(χ2=9.28,P=0.005).Conclusion G-MPI and DSCTCA both have high value in diagnosis of CAD,combination of these two methods can improve the diagnostic utility of CAD through obtaining both functional and anatomical information.
出处
《中国医学影像技术》
CSCD
北大核心
2011年第12期2465-2468,共4页
Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology