期刊文献+

双梯度磁共振成像质量参数的比较

Comparison on MR imaging quality parameters between ZOOM and WHOLE gradient Modes with GE Twinspeed MR scanner
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨双梯度MR成像系统常规成像序列在ZOOM和WHOLE梯度模式下的成像质量。方法采用GE双梯度MR系统,在ZOOM和WHOLE梯度模式下对Magphan-SMR170 MR成像参数测试体模内的5个测试平面分别行SE及FSE序列扫描,比较两种梯度模式下的成像质量参数。应用Matlab 7.0软件测量和计算SNR、信号均匀性、实测层厚、层厚误差、层间距误差、几何畸变率,直接在MR显示器上读取空间分辨率数据。结果与WHOLE梯度模式相比,SE序列成像ZOOM梯度模式下SNR及实测层厚差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05);与WHOLE梯度模式相比,FSE序列成像ZOOM梯度模式下SNR、信号均匀性、实测层厚、层间距误差、几何畸变率差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。结论 ZOOM梯度模式下的成像质量优于WHOLE梯度模式。临床应用中,在小FOV情况下,常规SE和FSE序列MR检查时应选择ZOOM梯度模式。 Objective To compare the imaging quality parameters between ZOOM and WHOLE gradient modes in routine imaging sequence with GE Twinspeed MR system.Methods MR scanning was performed to 5 test planes of Magphan-SMR170 phantom under ZOOM and WHOLE gradient modes using SE and FSE sequences.The imaging quality parameters including SNR,image uniformity,actual slice thickness,slice thickness error,interlayer spacing error,the rate of geometry distortion and spatial resolution were measured or calculated.Spatial resolution was read on the screen directly,and the other parameters were obtained with Matlab 7.0 software.Results Between ZOOM and WHOLE gradient mode,statistical difference of SNR and actual slice thickness was found using SE sequence(all P0.05),while there was statistical difference of SNR,image uniformity,actual slice thickness,interlayer spacing error and the rate of geometry distortion using FSE sequence(all P0.05).Conclusion The imaging quality of ZOOM gradient mode is better than that of WHOLE gradient mode.ZOOM gradient mode should be selected in clinical application of small FOV routine MR examination with SE and FSE sequences.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2011年第12期2541-2544,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
基金 河北省卫生厅科技成果推广课题(20110294)
关键词 磁共振成像 图像质量 梯度模式 Magnetic resonance imaging Image quality Gradient pattern
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Zhang B, Yen YF, Chronik BA, et al. Peripheral nerve stimula- tion properties of head and body gradient eoils of various sizes. Magn Reson Med, 2003,50 (1) : 50-58.
  • 2倪萍,蔡华.磁共振成像设备新进展[J].医疗设备信息,2005,20(12):1-4. 被引量:9
  • 3Holland OT, Marchand P. Graphics and GUIs with Matlab. London: Chapman & Hou/CRC, 2003 : 32-202.
  • 4林志凯,邓军,侯长松,等.医用磁共振成像设备影像质量检测与评价规范.北京:人民卫生出版社,2007:1-7.
  • 5俎栋林.核磁共致成像学.北京:高等教育出版社,2004:99.
  • 6张健,周生岩,赵锋,刘刚.医用磁共振成像系统影像参数的评估[J].中国医学影像技术,2002,18(9):945-946. 被引量:5
  • 7王存玖,唐鹤菡,龚启勇,幸浩洋.磁共振成像QA的自动实现方法[J].中国医学影像技术,2010,26(1):164-166. 被引量:6
  • 8AAPM. Acceptance testing and quality assurance procedures for magnetic resonance imaging facilities. Maryland: AAPM, 2010: :14-20.
  • 9Chen CC, Wan YL, Wai YY, et al. Quality assurance of clinical MRI scanners using ACR MRI phantom: preliminary results. J Digit Imaging, 2004,17(4) :279-284.
  • 10康立丽,余晓锷.MRI图像信噪比影响因素分析[J].放射学实践,2001,16(6):404-404. 被引量:17

二级参考文献23

  • 1冯锡钢,温志波,黄凡衡,林意群.脑功能成像时磁共振仪器稳定性的一种简单评价方法[J].第一军医大学学报,2004,24(7):815-817. 被引量:6
  • 2徐子森,苗元青,王燕.3.0TMR的进展现状及优势分析[J].医疗设备信息,2005,20(2):38-39. 被引量:3
  • 3王秀彬,胡振民.磁共振成像相阵控线圈及并行成像技术[J].医疗卫生装备,2005,26(6):19-20. 被引量:18
  • 4张宏杰,宋枭禹,包尚联,俎栋林.磁共振成像射频线圈技术[J].中国医学影像技术,2005,21(9):1440-1441. 被引量:23
  • 5Price RR, Axel L, Monan T, et al. Quality assurance methods and phantoms for magnetic resonance imaging: report of AAPM nuclear magnetic resonance Task Group No. 1. Med Phys, 1990, 17(2) :287-295.
  • 6Firbank MJ, Harrison RM, Williams ED, et al. Quality assurance for MRI: practical experience. Br J Radiol, 2000,73(868) :376-383.
  • 7Weisskoff RM. Simple measurement of scanner stability for functional NMR imaging of activation in the brain. Magn Reson Med, 1996,36(4) :643- 645.
  • 8Kruger R. Analysis and comparison of the signal difference to noise ratio (SDNR), signal difference (SD), and the signal to noise ratio (SNR): evaluating the suitability of the SD and SDNR as MRI quality control parameters. Chicago: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual EMBS International Conference, 2000, 3:2157-2160.
  • 9Friedman L, Glover GH. Report on a muhicenter fMRI quality assurance protocol. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2006,23(6):827-839.
  • 10Field AS, Yen YF, Burdette JH, et al. False cerebral activation on BOLD functional MR images: study of low-amplitude motion weakly correlated to stimulus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2000, 21 (8) : 1388-1396.

共引文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部