期刊文献+

对名源动词语义生成的形式化分析

A Formalist Analysis of the Semantic Generation of Denominal Verbs
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文旨在论证名源动词的语义生成受制于先验的运算机制。文章运用形式化分析手段,即名源动词的句法推导机制和“生成词库”的语义生成机制,着重分析了名源动词在句法推导中形成的结构关系和“生成词库”的语义生成机制的共同制约下的微观语义生成过程。研究发现,名源动词的句法推导规定了其语义生成的结构路径;“生成词库”的语义生成机制依次发挥作用,构建名源动词的语义特征;形式化分析可以解释名源动词的体特征、体跨类以及事态内在结构等语义现象。本研究的结论是:词汇语义的生成在一定程度上要受制于先验的运算机制。 This paper argues that the semantic generation of denominal verbs is subject to innate computational mechanisms. A formalist analysis,based on the mechanism of syntactic derivation of denominal verbs and that of semantic generation in Generative Lexicon, is devoted to the microscopic process whereby the meaning of a denominal verb is generated under the joint constraints of the structural relationship resulting from its syntactic derivation and the semantic mechanisms in Generative Lexicon. It is found that syntactic derivation determines the structural route along which a denominal verb has its meaning generated, that the semantic mechanisms in Generative Lexicon are responsible for the step-by-step build-up of its semantic features, and that the semantic traits of a denominal verb concerning its aspectual property, aspectual shift and eventuality structure receive a plausible account in the formalist analysis. A tentative conclusion is that innate computational mechanism plays a role in the generation of lexical meaning.
作者 程杰
出处 《外语与外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第6期6-11,共6页 Foreign Languages and Their Teaching
基金 教育部人文社科研究项目“英汉构词句法对比研究:名源动词的最简方案推导及诠释”(项目编号:08JC740010) 广东省哲学社会科学“十一五”规划项目“英汉句法对比研究:名源动词的最简方案诠释”(项目编号:08YK-01)的阶段性成果
关键词 名源动词 语义生成 句法推导 生成词库 denominal verb semantic generation syntactic derivation Generative Lexicon
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Bierwisch, M. & R. Schreuder. 1992. From concepts to lexical items[J]. Cognition, (42) :23 -60.
  • 2Chomsky, N. 1972. Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar [M]. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • 3Chomsky, N. 1985. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use [ M ]. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.
  • 4Clark,E. & H. Clark. 1979. When nouns surface as verbs[J]. Language, (55) :767 - 811.
  • 5Dirven, R. 1999. Conversion as a conceptual metonymy of event schemata [A]. In Panther, K. & G. Radden ( eds. ). Metonymy in Language and Thought[C]. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • 6Hale,K. & S. Keyser. 1993. On argument structure and lexical expression of syntactic relations[ A]. In Hale, K. & S. Keyser( eds. ). The View from Building 20 : Essays in Linguistics in honour of Sylvain Bromberger[C]. Cambridge:The MIT Press.
  • 7Harley,H. 1999. Denominal verbs and Aktionsart [A]. In Pylkanen, L. & A. van Hout (eds.). Proceedings of the 2nd Penn/MlT Roundt- able on Event Structure: MITWPL 35 [C]. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • 8Harley, H. 2003. How Do Verbs Get Their Names? Denominal Verbs, Manner Incorporation and the Ontology of Verb Roots in English [D[. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Tucson: University of Arizona.
  • 9Katz, J. & P. Postal. 1964. An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions[ M]. Cambridge:The MIT Press.
  • 10Kelly, M. 1998. Rule and idiosyncratically derived denominal verbs: Effects of language production and comprehension [J]. Memory &Cognition, (26) :369 -381.

二级参考文献51

  • 1高芳,徐盛桓.名动转用语用推理的认知策略[J].外语与外语教学,2000(4):13-16. 被引量:56
  • 2高芳,徐盛桓.名动转用与语用推理[J].外国语,2000,23(2):7-14. 被引量:69
  • 3徐盛桓.名动转用与功能代谢[J].外语与外语教学,2001(8):2-5. 被引量:50
  • 4徐盛桓.名动转用的语义基础[J].外国语,2001,24(1):15-23. 被引量:130
  • 5温宾利,程杰.论轻动词v的纯句法本质[J].现代外语,2007,30(2):111-123. 被引量:42
  • 6朱德熙.汉语句法中的歧义现象[J].中国语文,1980,(2).
  • 7Baxter, W. H. & L. Sagart. 1998. Word formation in Old Chinese [A]. In J. L. Packard(ed.). New Approaches to Chinese Word-formation: Morphology, Phonology, Lexicon in Modern and Ancient Chinese [C]. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 35-76.
  • 8Bierwisch, M. & R. Schreuder. 1992. From concepts to lexical items [J]. Cognition 42: 23-60.
  • 9Chan, M. K. M. & J. H-Y Tai. 1995. From nouns to verbs: Verbalization in Chinese dialects and East Asian languages [A]. Paper presented at the 6th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics [C]. NACCL-6 (2). University of South Carolina, 49-74.
  • 10Chomsky, N. 2005. On phases [A]. In R. Freidin, C P. Otero & M. L. Zubizarreta (eds.). Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory [C ]. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.

共引文献155

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部