期刊文献+

影响中国英语学习者口语流利性的语调短语内部停顿研究 被引量:23

Investigation into Fluency-related IP-internal Pauses in Chinese EFL Learners’ Spontaneous Speech
原文传递
导出
摘要 本研究主要考察中国英语学习者自发语流中影响口语流利性的语调短语内部停顿,旨在找出其主要特点及产生原因。研究采用分层随机抽样的方法选取了30名大学生作为研究对象。先采集并分析了他们即席话语中的停顿,以及受试随后对停顿原因的内省辨认。然后,研究者将这两组数据与教师评分进行了比对分析。研究发现:语调短语内部停顿总体频率较高,且频率高低与口语流利性显著相关;停顿位置集中于实词前和首词后;停顿模式主要有:“非流利串”、“无填充停顿”和“非词语填充项”;造成语调短语内部停顿的主要原因是言语计划功能,这种计划功能在类型和作用上呈现多样性。本研究提醒我们在从事口语流利性研究和教学中要关注二语学习者口语产出过程中的心理过程。 The present research aims at investigating the main features and possible causes of fluency-related IP-internal pauses in Chinese EFL learners' spontaneous speech. Selected through stratified-random sampling, 30 university students participated the experiment. The IP-intemal pauses which occurred in the subjects'English speech and their retrospection on possible causes were firstly recorded and analyzed. The data thus obtained were studied in comparison with the holistic scores given by experienced teachers to the learners' speech. The results are as follows : The Chinese EFL learners exhibited a high frequency of IP-internal pauses in their spontaneous speech, which correlated significantly with their oral fluency. The locations of the IP-internal pauses appeared mostly before content words or after the first word. The recurring patterns included the clusters of dysfluency, the unfilled pauses and the non-lexical fillers. The majority of the causes of IP-internal pauses could be attributed to the planning function during the speech production, which, however, varied both in type and function, The study should draw the attention of both researchers and teachers to the psychological processes of L2 learners during language production.
作者 杨萌 穆凤英
出处 《外语与外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第6期16-21,共6页 Foreign Languages and Their Teaching
基金 教育部人文社科研究一般项目“基于交际有效度的英语语调习得研究”(项目编号:11YJA740113) 徐州师范大学人文社科基金项目“影响中国英语学习者口语流利性的交际策略研究”(项目编号:09XWB09)阶段性成果
关键词 口语流利性 语调短语 停顿 语调短语内部停顿 oral fluency intonational phrase pause IP-intemal pause
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1Brumfit, C. 2000. Accuracy and fluency: The basic polarity [ A ]. In Riggenbach, H. ( ed. ). Perspectives on Fluency [ C ]. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.
  • 2Carroll,D. 2004. Psychology of Language(4^th edition. ) [M]. Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth.
  • 3Chambers,F. 1997. What do we mean by fluency? [J]. System,25(4) :535 -544.
  • 4Clark, H. & T. Wasow. 1998. Repeating words in spontaneous speech [J]. Cognitive Psychology, (37) :201 -242.
  • 5Cruttenden, A. 2002. Intonation (2^nd edition. ) [ M ]. Beijing: Peking University Press & Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  • 6Fillmore, C. 2000. On Fluency [ A ]. In Riggenbach, H. ( ed. ). Perspectives on Fluency [ C ]. East Lansing: The University of Michigan Press.
  • 7Koponen, M. & H. Riggenbach. 2000. Overview: Varying perspectives on Fluency [ A ]. In Riggenbach, H. ( ed. ). Perspectives on Fluency [C]. East Lansing:The University of Michigan Press.
  • 8Kormos, J. & M. Denes. 2004. Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners [J]. System, 32 (2) :145 - 164.
  • 9Krivokapic, J. 2007. Prosodic planning: Effects of phrasal length and complexity on pause duration [ J ]. Journal of Phonetics, ( 35 ) :162 - 179.
  • 10Lennon, P. 1990. Investigating fluency in EFL:A quantitative approach[ J]. Language Learning,40( 3 ) :387 -417.

二级参考文献261

共引文献612

同被引文献284

引证文献23

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部