法庭论辩的对话框架分析

Analysis on Dialogical Framework of Court Argumentation

法庭论辩的对话过程发生在具有观点冲突的双方当事人与调解和判决此冲突的中立的第三方。为了保证论辩能顺利进行,可通过设立对话论辩的条件、论辩规则,从而为当事人双方创造平等诉讼的条件,提供可靠的程序保障。在对话过程中,控辩双方提出主张、反驳、辩护和撤回主张,并且对支持自己的主张或反对对方的主张提出论证,而审方监视双方当事人是否遵守程序规则,通过证据是否被采纳来规定论辩范围、分配举证责任、调整次序和终止论辩。

The dialogue process of court argumentation occurs in bipartite litigants with conflict and moderate third-party of mediating and ruling the conflict. In order that guarantee the argument can be carried out smoothly, we create equal litigation condition and provides the reliable procedure guarantee for both parties by establishing dialogic conditions and rules of debate. In the dialogue process, both the prosecutor and the defendant claim, retort, defend and withdraw their claims, and have argue with claims that support or oppose, and the judgment monitor whether both parties com- ply with procedural rules and regulate scope of argumentation, distribution burden, adjusting order and terminate this debate according to evidential adopt.