期刊文献+

运输类飞机巡航阻力CFD计算分析 被引量:4

CFD Analysis for Transport's Cruise Drag Prediction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对运输类飞机设计过程中的巡航阻力准确预测问题,采用基于多块结构网格求解三维雷诺平均Navier-Stokes方程的并行流动求解器"CCFTD-MB",对AIAA阻力预测小组提供的典型运输类飞机DLR_F6翼身构型进行了CFD计算分析,比较了不同规模网格及不同湍流模型对计算结果的影响;并通过与DLR_F4翼身构型计算结果及相关文献结果的综合分析,修正了DLR_F6翼身构型设引巡航点的试验阻力。计算结果表明:DLR_F6翼身构型的CFD计算结果更为可靠;CCFD-MB求解器计算精度高;C FD技术对于风洞试验验证有积极意义。 For the accurate prediction of cruise drag in transport designing, a CFD analysis for the typical transport aircraft DLR_F6 wing-body configuration which was supplied by AIAA drag prediction workshop is put in practice, with "CCFD-MB", a large parallelized Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes solver for multi-block structured grid; the effects of different meshes and different turbulence models on calculation results are compared; then a correction on DLR_F6 wing-body cruise drag which is from wind tunnel test is performed through comprehensive analysis of DLR F4 wing-body and relevant literature's results. It shows that the CFD results of DLR_F6 wing-body are more reliable than test data; CCFD-MB is an accurate flow solver and CFD is very positive for verifying the tunnel experiment.
出处 《航空工程进展》 2011年第4期402-408,共7页 Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering
基金 国家高技术研究发展计划资助(2009AA01A139)
关键词 巡航阻力预测 运输类飞机 CFD DLR_F6翼身构型 cruise drag prediction tansport aircraft CFD DLR_F6 wing body configuration
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1王运涛,王光学,张玉伦.DLR-F6翼身组合体阻力计算[J].计算物理,2008,25(2):145-150. 被引量:5
  • 2Redeker G.DLR_F4 wing-body configuration,a selection of experimental test cases for the validation of CFD codes. AGARD-AR-303 . 1994
  • 3Lain K,Vassberg J,Wahls R,et al.Summary of data from the second AIAA CFD drag prediction workshop. AIAA-2004 -555 . 2004
  • 4Brodersen O,Rakowitz M,Amant S,et al.Airbus,ONERA, and DLR results from the 2nd AIAA drag prediction workshop. AIAA-2004 -0391 . 2004
  • 5Pfeiffer N.Reflections on the second drag prediction workshop. AIAA-2004 -557 . 2004
  • 6MAY G,WEIDE E,JAMESON A,SRIRAM,MARTINELLI L.Drag prediction of the DLR-F6 configuration. AIAA Paper2004-396 .
  • 7Yamamoto K,Ochi A,Shima E,et al.CFD Sensitivity toDrag Prediction on DLR-F6 Configuration by StructuredMethod and Unstructured Method. AIAA 2004 -0398 . 2004
  • 8Levy D W,Zickuhr T,Vassberg J,et al.Summaryof data from the first AIAA CFD drag predictionworkshop. AIAA0841 . 2002

二级参考文献7

  • 1Johnson Forrester T,Tinoco Edward T,Yu N Jong. Thirty years of development and application of CFD at Boeing commercial airplane Seattle [ R]. AIAA 2003 - 3439,2003.
  • 2Tinoco E N, Bogue D R. Progress toward C FD for full flight envelope [ J ]. Aeronautical Journal, 2005,109(1100) :451 -460.
  • 3Oberkampf William L, Trucano Timothy G. Verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2002, 38:209 - 272.
  • 4Haase W, Chaput E, Leschziner M A. ECARP: European computational aerodynamics rearch project: Validation of CFD codes and assessment of turbulence models [ R]. Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Germany, 1997.
  • 5Levy David W, Zickuhr Tom, et al. Summary of data from the first AIAA CFD drag prediction workshop [R]. AIAA 2002 -0841, 2002.
  • 6Laflin K R,Klausmeyer S M,Zickuhr T. Summary of data from the second AIAA CFD drag prediction workshop [ R]. AIAA 2004- 0555,2004..
  • 7Rumsey C, Rivers S, Morrison J. Study of CFD variation on transport configurations for the second drag-prediction workshop[ R]. AIAA 2004 - 0393,2004.

共引文献4

同被引文献38

引证文献4

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部