期刊文献+

胆管癌细胞体外三维培养模型建立与二维培养体系中生长代谢的比较 被引量:1

Comparison of growth and metabolism of cholangiocarcinoma cells in two-dimensional and three-dimensional culture systems
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景:二维细胞培养是目前体外研究恶性肿瘤和检测抗肿瘤药物的常用方法,但存在局限性。目的:建立胆管癌细胞体外三维培养模型,比较在二维和三维培养体系中胆管癌细胞生长及代谢的差异。方法:将胆管癌细胞株QBC939培养于二维培养体系及Cytodex-3或Cytopore-2的三维培养体系中,观察细胞形态和数量,测定培养上清液中葡萄糖、乳酸浓度,计算细胞生长代谢动力学参数。结果与结论:与二维和Cytodex-3三维培养体系相比,由Cytopore-2构成的三维培养体系中细胞在微载体上贴壁率较高,分布均匀,所达到的细胞密度最高,且细胞的葡萄糖比消耗速率和乳酸比生成速率明显低于二维和Cytodex-3三维培养系统(P<0.05)。结果证实,采用Cytodex-3或Cytopore-2微载体培养体系均可建立胆管癌细胞的三维培养模型,且Cytopore-2三维培养体系优于二维和Cytodex-3三维培养体系。 BACKGROUND:Two-dimensional(2D) culture model is a common tool for tumor research and drug screening in vitro;however,there are some limitations.OBJECTIVE:To establish a three-dimensional(3D) culture model of cholangiocarcinoma cells and to compare the difference in cell growth and metabolism between 2D and 3D culture systems.METHODS:Cholangiocarcinoma cell line QBC939 was cultured in 2D and Cytodex-3 or Cytopore-2 microcarrier-based 3D culture systems.Cell morphology was observed under inverted light microscopy.Total cell number,glucose and lactate concentrations were determined,and the kinetic constants of cell growth and metabolism were calculated.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:In comparison with 2D and Cytodex-3-based 3D culture systems,Cytopore-2-based 3D culture system achieved higher cell adhesion rate,higher cell density,and lower specific glucose consumption and specific lactate production rates(P〈0.05) .In addition,cells were uniformly distributed in Cytopore-2 microcarriers.Therefore,Cytodex-3 or Cytopore-2 microcarriers can be used to establish cholangiocarcinoma 3D culture model,and Cytopore-2 3D culture system is better than Cytodex-3 system.
出处 《中国组织工程研究与临床康复》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第46期8621-8624,共4页 Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research
基金 上海市自然科学基金资助项目(编号:10ZR1407100) 国家重点实验室专项经费资助项目(编号:2060204)资助~~
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1杨庆诚,曾炳芳,张立智,张智长.组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂对骨肉瘤MNNG/HOS细胞凋亡的影响[J].肿瘤,2010,30(12):1004-1008. 被引量:4
  • 2Yamada K,Cukierman E.Modeling tissue morphogenesis and cancer in 3D.Cell.2007;130(4):601-610.
  • 3Kim J.Three-dimensional tissue culture models in cancer biology.Semin Cancer Biol.2005;15(5):365-377.
  • 4Lin R,Chang H.Recent advances in three-dimensional multicellular spheroid culture for biomedical research.Biotecnol J.2008;3(9-10):1172-1184.
  • 5Becker J,Blanchard D.Characterization of primary breast carcinomas grown in three-dimensional cultures.J Surg Res.2007;142(2):256-262.
  • 6Hartman O,Zhang C,Adams E,et al.Biofunctionalization of electrospun PCL-based scaffolds with perlecan domain IV peptide to create a 3-D pharmacokinetic cancer model.Biomaterials.2010;31(21):5700-5718.
  • 7Ghajar CM,Suresh V,Peyton SR,et al.A novel three-dimensional model to quantify metastatic melanoma invasion.Mol Cancer Ther.2007;6(2):552-561.
  • 8Rhee HW,Zhau HE,Pathak S,et al.Permanent phenotypic and genotypic changers of prostate cancer cells cultured in a three-dimensional rotating-wall vessel.In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim.2001;37(3):127-140.
  • 9Forestell S,Kalogerakis N,Behie L,et al.Development of the optimal inoculation conditions for microcarrier cultures.Biotechnol Bioeng.1992;39(3):305-313.
  • 10Mei Y,Luo H,Tang Q,et al.Modulating and modeling aggregation of cell-seeded microcarriers in stirred culture system for macrotissue engineering.J Biotechnol.2010;150(3):438-446.

二级参考文献4

共引文献3

同被引文献21

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部