期刊文献+

国产与进口药物洗脱支架治疗冠心病合并糖尿病患者的安全性和有效性 被引量:4

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察国产雷帕霉素药物洗脱支架(Partner)在冠心病合并糖尿病患者中应用的安全性和有效性。方法选择269例冠心病合并糖尿病患者置入雷帕霉素药物涂层支架,其中Partner组135例患者置入国产雷帕霉素药物洗脱支架(Partner支架),134例患者置入Cypher支架(Cypher组),术前术后常规用药,术后进行随访,观察患者临床主要不良心脏事件的发生情况,部分患者进行了冠状动脉造影随访。结果 269例患者共置入447枚支架,分析表明C型病变、双支、三支病变为多,两组患者一般临床情况差异无统计学意义。两组靶病变部位、病变长度、狭窄程度及病变类型差异均无统计学意义。其中Partner组置入支架229枚,Cypher组218枚。平均随访(360±50)d,其中Partner组复发心绞痛13例(9.6%),1例发生心肌梗死(0.7%);Cypher组复发心绞痛11例(8.2%),无心肌梗死发生(0.0%),Partner组发生再狭窄2例(1.5%),Cypher组发生再狭窄2例(1.5%)。两组无支架内血栓形成和死亡。结论对比Cypher支架,使用Partner支架在冠心病合并糖尿病患者中应用安全有效,在降低主要心脏不良事件预防再狭窄获得满意的临床效果。
出处 《中国老年学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第24期4761-4763,共3页 Chinese Journal of Gerontology
  • 相关文献

共引文献9

同被引文献57

  • 1李崇剑,高润霖,杨跃进,陈纪林,徐波,乔树宾,秦学文,袁晋青,吴永健,刘海波,姚民,陈珏,戴军.冠心病合并2型糖尿病患者选择性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗特点分析[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2007,15(1):11-14. 被引量:17
  • 2Creager MA, Lüscher TF, Cosentino F, et al. Diabetes and vascular disease: pathophysiology, clinical consequences, and medical therapy: Part Ⅰ[J]. Circulation, 2003,108(12):1527-1532. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000091257.27563.32.
  • 3Kornowski R, Lansky AJ. Current perspectives on interventional treatment strategies in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2000,50(2):245-254. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-726X(200006)50:23.0.CO;2-P.
  • 4Stone GW, Kedhi E, Kereiakes DJ, et al. Differential clinical responses to everolimus-eluting and Paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents in patients with and without diabetes mellitus[J]. Circulation, 2011,124(8):893-900. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.031070.
  • 5Hur SH, Cho YK, Nam CW, et al. Comparison of long-term outcomes following sirolimus-eluting stent vs paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation in patients with long calcified coronary lesions[J]. Clin Cardiol, 2009,3201):633-638. DOI: 10.1002/clc.20591.
  • 6Togni M, Eber S, Widmer J, et al. Impact of vessel size on outcome after implantation of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents: a subgroup analysis of the SIRTAX trial[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007,50(12):1123-1131. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.06.015.
  • 7Desch S, Schloma D, Mbius-Winkler S, et al. Randomized comparison of a polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent versus a polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with diabetes mellitus: the LIPSIA Yukon trial[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2011,4(4):452-459. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.11.016.
  • 8Wykrzykowska JJ, Rber L, de Vries T, et al. Biolimus-eluting biodegradable polymer versus sirolimus-eluting permanent polymer stent performance in long lesions: Results from the LEADERS multicentre trial substudy[J]. EuroIntervention, 2009,5(3):310-317. DOI: 10.4244/V5I3A49.
  • 9Puymirat E, Mangiacapra F, Peace A, et al. Long-term clinical outcome in patients with small vessel disease treated with drug-eluting versus bare-metal stenting[J]. Am Heart J, 2011,162(5):907-913. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.07.024.
  • 10Latib A, Colombo A, Castriota F, et al. A randomized multicenter study comparing a paclitaxel drug-eluting balloon with a paclitaxel-eluting stent in small coronary vessels: the BELLO (Balloon Elution and Late Loss Optimization) study[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2012,60(24):2473-2480. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.09.020.

引证文献4

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部