期刊文献+

克里斯托夫·西姆斯理性疏忽理论评介 被引量:2

原文传递
导出
摘要 2011年度诺贝尔奖经济学奖得主西姆斯近年来提出了理性疏忽理论,主要是将信息处理能力的约束纳入到经济分析之中。西姆斯认为即使信息是完全的,有限的信息处理能力也会使经济主体理性地忽略某些信息,从而信息的更新就是粘滞的。该理论用一个统一的分析框架解释经济主体的粘性选择行为,克服了传统完全理性假说的非现实性问题,在微观经济行为、宏观经济政策、经济周期等领域的研究中取得了许多重要成果,目前已成为经济学研究中迅速发展的理论体系。
作者 王军
出处 《经济学动态》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第12期104-109,共6页 Economic Perspectives
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目"理性疏忽框架下的经济周期理论研究"(11YJA790148)的阶段性成果之一 北京市属高校人才强教深化计划学术创新团队项目"经济周期理论前沿问题与中国宏观经济波动研究"(PHR201106140)的资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Luo, Y. & E. R. Young(2008a), "Rational inattention and aggregate fluctuations", Working Paper, University of Hong Kong.
  • 2Luo, Y.& E. R. Young (2008b), "Risk-- sensitive con sumption and savings under rational inattention", Working Paper, University of Hong Kong.
  • 3Mackowiak, B. & M. Wiederholt(2007), "Business cycle dynamics under rational inattention ", http://faculty. wcas. northwestern, edu.
  • 4Martins, G. & D. Sinigaglia (2009), "Real business cycle dynamics under rational inattention", MPRA Paper No. 14089.
  • 5Menkulasi, J. (2009), "A rational inattention theory of mac- roeconomic fluctuations", https ://editorialexpress. com.
  • 6Moscarini, O. (2004), "Limited information capacity as a source of inertia", Journal of Economic Dynamics and Con trol 28(1.0) :2003--2035.
  • 7Rolniek(2007), "Christopher Sims", The Region, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, 13--21.
  • 8Sims, C. A. (2003), "Implications of rational inattention", Journal of Monetary Economics 50(3):665--690.
  • 9Sims, C. A. (2006a), "Rational inattention: Beyond the lin- ear- quadratic case", American Economic Review 96 (2) : 158--163.
  • 10Sims, C. A. ( 1998 ), "Stickiness", Carnegie -- Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 49:317--356.

二级参考文献56

  • 1Akerlof, George A. and Janet L. Yellen, 1985, "A Near- Rational Model of the Business Cycle, with Wage and Price Inertia", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 100, pp.823-38.
  • 2Ball, Laurence, N. Gregory Mankiw and Ricardo Reis, 2005, "Monetary Policy for Inattentive Economies", Journal of Monetary Economics, Volume 52, Issue 4, May, pp.703-725.
  • 3Branch William A., John Carlson, George W. Evans and Bruce MeGough, 2007a, "Monetary Policy, Endogenous Inattention, and the Volatility Trade-off", http://www.soesci.uci.edu/- wbraneh/EndoInworkingpaperO7Dec04, pdf.
  • 4Branch, William A., 2007b, "Sticky Information and Model Uncertainty in Survey Data on Inflation Expectations", Journal of economic Dynamics and Control, Volume 31, Issue 1, January, pp.245-276.
  • 5Branch William A., John Carlson, George W. Evans and Bruce McGough, 2006, "Adaptive Learning, Endogenous Inattention, and Changes in Monetary Policy',https://www.clevelandfed. org/research/Workpaper/2006/wp0610, pdf.
  • 6Calvo, G. A., 1983, "Staggered Prices in a Utility-Maximizing Framework", Journal of Monetary Economics, 12, pp.383-398.
  • 7Coibion, Olivier, 2006, "Inflation Inertia in Sticky Information Models", Contributions to Macroeconomics,Volume 6, Issue 1, Article 1.
  • 8Dupor, Bill., Tomoyuki Kitamura and Takayuki Tsuruga, 2006, "Do Sticky Prices Need to Be Replaced with Sticky Infor- mation",http://www.e.u -tokyo.ac.jp/cirje/research/workshops/macro/ documents/macrobbl1109_000, pdf.
  • 9Fischer, Stanley, 1977, "Long-Term Contracts, Rational Expectations and the Optimal Money Supply Rule", The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 85, No. 1, pp.191-205.
  • 10Fuhrer, Jeffrey. and George Moore, 1995, "Inflation Persistence", Quarte fly Journal of Economics, vol. 110, pp. 127-160.

共引文献27

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部