期刊文献+

超高龄急性心肌梗死患者住院病死率及相关因素分析 被引量:10

The in-hospital mortality and its determinants for very elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨超高龄急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者的院内病死率及相关因素.方法 采用回顾性队列研究方法,对自2002年1月至2010年2月期间住院年龄≥80岁超高龄AMI患者进行分析.结果 499例患者住院期间死亡97例,病死率为19.4%,其中ST段抬高急性心肌梗死(STEAMI)297例,死亡69例,病死率23.2%,非ST段抬高心肌梗死202例,死亡28例,病死率13.9%,两者差异有统计学意义(P=0.009).死亡组与存活组临床资料单因素比较显示:死亡组感染、消化道出血、高血压病史、完全性房室传导阻滞、心脏破裂、心功能KillipⅢ、Ⅳ级、肾功能不全及STEAMI的比例显著高于存活组(P值均<0.05);而行急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的比例显著低于存活组(P<0.05).多因素logistic回归分析显示:心功能Killip分级、完全性房室传导阻滞、肾功能不全、急诊支架植入及心肌梗死类型为高龄AMI患者院内死亡的独立预测因素.结论 心功能Killip分级、完全性房室传导阻滞、肾功能不全、是否行急诊植入支架及MI类型为超高龄AMI患者院内死亡的独立预测因素,对超高龄AMI患者在掌握适应证的前提下行PCI可提高其住院存活率. Objective To explore the in-hospital mortality and its determinants for very eldly (80 + years of age) patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).Methods A retrospective cohort method was used.The 499 study subjects were very eldly patients with newly diagnosed AMI consecutively admitted into our department between January 1,2002 and February 22,2010.Results Ninety-seven out of 499 patients died during hospitalization period,with total in-hospital mortality of 19.4%.Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed the independent determinants for mortality of very elderly AMI patients were cardiac Killip grades,complete A-V block,renal dysfunction,stent implant,and the type of AMI.Conclusions The independent determinants for mortality of elderly AMI patients are as following,cardiac Killip grade,complete A-V block,renal dysfunction,stent implant,and the type of MAI.Urgent PCI is safe and effective for some very elderly with AMI,which could improve their survival rate within hospitalization period.
出处 《中华内科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第12期1023-1025,共3页 Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine
关键词 心肌梗死 老年人 死亡率 Myocardial infarction Elderly Mortality
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Yan RT,Yan AT,Tan M,et al.Age-related differences in the management and outcome of patients with acute coronary syndromes.Am Heart J,2006,151:352-359.
  • 2朱慧楠,霍勇,蒋捷,李工,宋娜娜,刘琳.老年非ST段抬高心肌梗死临床特点及院内死亡因素分析[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2009,8(3):235-239. 被引量:6
  • 3Yildiz O.Vascular smooth muscle and endothelial functions in aging.Ann N Y Acad Sci,2007,1100:353-360.
  • 4Gottlieb S,Behar S,Hod H,et al.Trends in management,hospital and long-term outcomes of elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction.Am J Med,2007,120:90-97.
  • 5Kalla K,Christ G,Karnik R,et al.Implementation of guidelines improves the standard of care:the Viennese registry on reperfusion strategies in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (Vienna STEMI registry).Circulation,2006,113:2398-2405.
  • 6Peterson ED,Alexander KP,Malenka DJ,et al.Multicenter experience in revascularization of very elderly patients.Am Heart J,2004,148:486-492.
  • 7Lucas FL,DeLorenzo MA,Siewers AE,et al.Temporal trends in the utilization of diagnostic testing and treatments for cardiovascular disease in the United States,1993-2001.Circulation,2006,113:374-379.
  • 8Pagé M,Doucet M,Eisenberg MJ,et al.Temporal trends in revascularization and outcomes after acute myocardial infarction among the very elderly.CMAJ,2010,182:1415-1420.
  • 9Cannon CP,Weintraub WS,Demopoulos LA,et al.Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein Ⅱ b/Ⅲ ainhibitor tirofiban.N Engl J Med,2001,344:1879-1887.
  • 10Wallentin L,Lagerqvist B,Husted S,et al.Outcome at 1 year after an invasive compared with a non-invasive strategy in unstable coronary-artery disease:the FRISC Ⅱ invasive randomised trial.FRISC Ⅱ Investigators.Fast Revascularisation during Instability in Coronary artery disease.Lancet,2000,356:9-16.

二级参考文献19

  • 1王士雯,钱小顺.老年人多器官功能衰竭肺启动的研究进展[J].中华老年医学杂志,2005,24(4):313-316. 被引量:60
  • 2王小艳.经皮冠脉介入治疗在非ST段抬高急性心肌梗死或非稳定型心绞痛不同性别患者中的比较[J].中国处方药,2006,5(11):27-27. 被引量:12
  • 3Kyriakides ZS, Kourouklis S, Kontaras K. Acute cor onary syndromes in the elderly. Drugs Aging, 2007, 24:901-912.
  • 4Cheitlin MD, Zipes DP. Part Ⅶ, Chapter 57: Cardiovascular disease in the elderly. In: Braunwald's heart disease: A text - book of cardiovascular medicine. 6th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Saunders Company, 2001. 2019-2037.
  • 5Yan RT, Yan AT, Tan M,et al. Age related differences in the management and outcome of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J, 2006,151:352-359.
  • 6Batyraliev TA, Pershukov IV, Iurova AN, et al. Guidelines of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association 2007 for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. Part Ⅰ. Kardiologiia, 2008,48: 77-95.
  • 7Alpert JS, Thvqesen K, Antman E, et al. Myocardial infarction redefined a consensus document of the Joint European Society of Cardiology/American Col lege of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000,36 : 959-969.
  • 8Singh M, Mathew V, Garratt KN, et al. Effect of age on the outcome of angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction among patients treated at the Mayo Clinic. Am J Med,2000,108:187- 192.
  • 9Holay MP, Janhandhu A, Javahirani A, et al. Clinical profile of acute myocardial infarction in elderly (prospective study). J Assoc Physicians India, 2007,55: 188-192.
  • 10Joly L, Benetos A. Clinical specificities of coronary artery disease in the elderly. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss, 2006,99:29-33.

共引文献27

同被引文献95

  • 1姚菁,郑治渊,黄芸,张维,谈中茹,陈阳,邱朝晖,朱华.老年患者在冠脉支架术后长期联合运用阿司匹林和氯吡格雷的安全性及有效性的临床观察[J].老年医学与保健,2007,13(4):234-236. 被引量:5
  • 2FazeI R, Krumholz HM, Bates ER,et al. National Registry of Myocardi- al Infarction (NRMI) Investigators. Choice of reperfusion strategy at hos- pitals with primary percutaneous cor- onary intervention: a National Regis- try of Myocardial Infarction analysis [J]. Circulation, 2009,120 ( 24 ) : 2455-2461.
  • 3Batchelor WB, Anstrom KJ, Muhl- baier LH, et al. Contemporary out- come trends in the elderly undergoing pereutaneous coronary interventions: results in 7472 octogenarians. Na- tional Cardiovascular Network Col- laboration[ J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2000,36( 3 ) :723-730.
  • 4Taira DA, BerezinR, Chauhan MS, el al. Percutaneous coronary revascu- larization in elderly patients: impact on functional status and quality of life [ J]. Ann Intern Med, 2000, 132 (12) :955-958.
  • 5Rasoul S, Ottervanger JP, de Boer M J, et al. Zwolle Myocardial Infarc- tion Study Group. Primary percuta- neous coronary intervention for ST-el- evation myocardial infarction: from clinical trial to clinical practice[ J ]. Int J Cardiol, 2009, 134 ( 1 ): 104-109.
  • 6Gunn J, Kuttila K, Vasques F, et al. Comparison of results of coronary artery bypass grafting versus percuta- neous coronary intervention in Octo- genarians[J]. Am J Cardiol,2012.[ Epub ahead of print ].
  • 7Groeneveld PW, Matta MA, Green- hut AP, at al. Drug-cluting com- pared with bare-metal coronary stents among elderly patients [J]. J Am Coll Cardio1,2008,51 ( 21 ) :2017-2024.
  • 8Tracy Y,Wang MD, Frederick A, et al. Percutaneous coronary interven- tion and drug-eluting stent use among patients > 85 years of age in the Unit- ed States [J]. J Am Col] Cardiol, 2012,59(2) :105-112.
  • 9Marcolino MS, Simsek C, de Boer, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes in octogenarians undergoing percuta- neous coronary intervention with stenting [ J ]. Euro Intervention, 2012. [ Epub ahead of print].
  • 10Li R J, Yan BP, Yan MD, et al.Quality of life after percutaneous cor- onary intervention in the elderly with acute coronary syndrome Internation- al[ J ]. Journal of Cardiology, 2012, 155 ( 1 ) :90-96.

引证文献10

二级引证文献63

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部