期刊文献+

反垄断效率抗辩适用模式及不确定性克服 被引量:2

On the Applicable Mode of Efficiency Plea on Antitrust and How to Overcome Its Uncertainty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 反垄断法上的效率抗辩,是指经营者通过证明集中的效率效果足以抵消或超过反竞争效果而取得反垄断法豁免。在效率抗辩的适用上,世界范围内存在抵消分析、一体分析和混合分析三种模式。基于我国国情和《反垄断法》的相关规定,我国更宜采用混合分析模式。在此基础上,还需要借助相应措施克服效率抗辩本身的不确定性,提高制度运用的可能性。 The efficiency plea on the antitrust law refers that the intensified efficiency effect proved by the operator is sufficient to set off or stronger than the anti-competition effect so as to be exempted by the antitrust law.Considering the actual situation in our country and in accordance with regulations by the Antitrust Law of China,a mixed analysis mode is suggested for application.Moreover,it is necessary to make measures to overcome the uncertainty of efficiency plea in order to improve its feasibility.
作者 应品广
出处 《北方法学》 2011年第6期151-157,共7页 Northern Legal Science
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“文化产业竞争秩序的规制研究--以竞争法的适用为视角”(项目编号10YJA820116) 华东政法大学研究生创新能力培养专项资金资助项目“反垄断法中的效率抗辩法律问题研究”(项目编号0901006)的研究成果
关键词 效率抗辩 抵消分析 一体分析 混合分析 efficiency plea analysis of setting off integral analysis mixed analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1EC Horizontal Merger Guidelines, available at: http://eur -lex europa eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ, do? uri =CELEX:52(134XC0205(02) :EN:HTMK.
  • 2Report of the Advisory Panel on Efficiencies, Submitted to Sheridan Scott, Commissioner of Competition, August 2005, available at : http :// www. competitionbureau, gc. ca/epic/site/cb -be. nsf/en/02114e, html.
  • 3Report of the Advisory Panel on Efficiencies, Submitted to Sheridan Scott, Chapter 6 : Conclusions and Recommendations of the Panel, Commissioner of Competition, August 2005, available at: http://www, competitionbureau, gc. ca/epic/site/cb -bc. nsf/en/01954e, html.
  • 4Guideline for Review M&A, available at: http ://eng. ftc. go. kr/bbs, do? command = getList&type_cd = 12.
  • 5Thomas A. Piraino, Jr. ,A New Approach to the Antrust Analysis of Mergers, 83 B. U. L. Rev. 785(2003).
  • 6[美]保罗.萨缪尔森,威廉·诺德豪斯.《经济学》,萧琛主译,人民邮电出版社2003年版,第150页.
  • 7孙颖.论竞争法对消费者的保护[J].中国政法大学学报,2008(4):88-98. 被引量:28
  • 8尚明主编.《反垄断法理论与中外案例评析》,北京大学出版社2007年版,第31-33页.
  • 9Draft Bulletin on Efficiencies in Merger Review, available at: http ://www. competitionbureau, gc. ca/epic/site/cb -bc. nsf/en/O2719e, html.
  • 10Form CO Relating to the Notification of a Concentration Pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 139/2004, available at : http ://ec europa, eu/competition/mergers/legislation/form co en. pdf.

二级参考文献16

共引文献44

同被引文献41

  • 1江山.论反垄断法规范中的规则与标准[J].环球法律评论,2021,43(3):67-84. 被引量:19
  • 2郑友德,杨国云.现代反不正当竞争法中“竞争关系”之界定[J].法商研究(中南财经政法大学学报),2002,19(6):64-69. 被引量:50
  • 3杨立新,刘宗胜.论抗辩与抗辩权[J].河北法学,2004,22(10):6-12. 被引量:34
  • 4王晓晔.我国最新反垄断法草案中的若干问题[J].上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,15(1):13-18. 被引量:20
  • 5[美]吉尔伯特·C·菲特,吉姆·E·里斯,司徒淳,等.美国经济史[M].沈阳:辽宁人民出版社,1981.
  • 6[美]理查德·A·波斯纳.反托拉斯法[M].孙秋宁译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003.
  • 7Rogier W. de Vrey. Towards a European Unfair Competition Law[M]. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2005: 78.
  • 8Spencer Weber Waller. In Search of Economic Justice: Considering Competition and Consumer Protection Law[J]. Loy-ola University Chicago Law Journal, 2005, (3): 631.
  • 9Timothy J. Muffs. Principles for a Successful Competition Agency[J]. University of Chicago Law Review, 2005, (7) 165.
  • 10Christine Jolis, Cass R. Sunstein, Richard Thaler. A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics[J]. Stanford Law Review, 1998, (3): 1471, 1476.

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部