期刊文献+

情绪与决策:躯体标记假设及其研究新进展 被引量:9

Emotion and Decision-making: the Somatic Marker Hypothesis and its Recent Developments
下载PDF
导出
摘要 人类的决策被广泛认为是一个理性的和认知主导的过程,因此在决策研究中,任何形式的情绪都被避免。最近,一些神经科学的研究显示,情绪是人类决策中的一部分,它不可以与认知分析过程相分离,并且有些时候,情绪甚至在决策过程中起着重要的作用。躯体标记假设就提供了一个情绪如何影响人们决策的神经解剖和认知的框架,其核心为决策受躯体状态(或标识信号)所影响,躯体状态来源于生物调节过程,包括情绪和情感过程。该文章介绍了何为躯体标记假设,躯体标记假设的实验研究,以及研究中的新进展。 Human decision-making is widely considered as a rational and cognition dominated process, and hence any form of emotion should be avoided. Recently, some evidences from neuro-science research indicate that emotion as an integrated part of human decision process, cannot be separated from the cognitive analysis, and sometimes role. The somatic marker even plays an important hypothesis provides a systems-level neuroanatomical and cognitive framework for decision-making and its influence by emotion.The key idea of this hypothesis is that decision-mak- ing is a process that is influenced by marker signals that arise in bioregulatory processes, including those that express themselves in emotions and feelings. In this study, we introduce the somatic hypothesis, its experimental research and the recent developments in decision-making.
出处 《应用心理学》 CSSCI 2011年第2期160-168,共9页 Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology
基金 国家自然科学基金(70771101 71071137) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金(10YJC630075) 浙江省自然科学基金(Y2100540 Y7100581)。
关键词 躯体标记假设 躯体状态 决策 somatic marker hypothesis, somatic states, decision-making
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1Bechara, A. , & Damasio, A. R. (2005). The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision. Games and Economic Behavior, 52, 336 -372.
  • 2Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H. & Anderson, S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition ,50, 7 - 12.
  • 3Bechara, A. , Damasio, H. , Tranel, D. , & Damasio, A. R. (1997). Deciding advanta-geously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275, 1293 - 1295.
  • 4Bechara, A. , Tranel, D. , Damasio, H. & Damasio, A. R. (1996), Failure to respond autonomically to anticipated Future outcomes following damage to prefrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 6, 215-225.
  • 5Bowman, C. H. , Evans, C. E. , & Turnbull, O. H. (2005). Artificial time constraints on the Iowa Gambling Task: The effects on behavioral performance and subjective experience. Brain and Cognition, 57, 21-25.
  • 6Carter, S. , Marcia, C. , & Pasqualini, S. (2004) Stronger autonomic response accompanies better learning: A test of Damasio' somatic maker hypothesis. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 901-911.
  • 7Coricelli, G. , Ritchley, H. D. , Joffily, M. , O'Doherty, J. P. , Sirigu, A. , & Dolam, R. J. (2005). Regret and its avoidance: a neuroimaging study of choice behavior, nature 8, 1255 - 1262.
  • 8Damasio, A. R. , (1994). Descartes'error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. Grosset/Putnam, New York.
  • 9Damasio, A. R. , (1996). The somatic marker hypothesis and the possiblefunctions of the prefrontal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (series B) ,351 ( 1346), 1413 - 1420.
  • 10Damasio, A. R., Tranel, D., & Damasio, H. (1991). Somatic markers and the guidance of behavior: Theory and preliminary testing. In H. S. Levin, H. M. Eisenberg, A.L. Benton, ( Eds. ) , Frontal Lobe Function and Dysfunction. New York: Oxford University Press.

同被引文献71

引证文献9

二级引证文献63

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部