期刊文献+

从《坎大哈人文地形报告》探讨人类学在我军军事教育中的开设和研究 被引量:3

The Study of Anthropology in the PLA Military Education Stimulated by Kandahar Hunane and Topographical Report
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《坎大哈人文地形报告》是"人文地形小组"运用人类学方法介入战争的直观实例,分析《坎大哈人文地形报告》的主要内容可看出其调查研究涉及文化、政治、人口、民族信仰等问题,主要采用了客观描述、推论性数字统计等方法,这对我军军事教育开设和研究人类学有重要的借鉴意义。历史上人类学介入战争发挥过巨大的作用,但也存在伦理学争议,人类学纳入军事教育将有助于消除争议,并增强军队作战的科学性。 The Kandahar Survey Report is an example of the Humane and topographical Team applying anthropological methods in war fare. By analyzing the contents of the Kandahar Survey Report, it can be found that such factors as culture, polities, demographics, and national belief are involved in their investigation. In the report they utilizes both objective description and inferential statistics. These methods are of significance for the PLA to introduce anthropology into military education and research. Anthropology exerted great influence on wars in history. However, there are some ethnic disputes about anthropology in this respect. To introduce anthropology into our military education will help eliminate ethnic disputes and help the armed forces to fight battles in a scientific way.
作者 白育芳
机构地区 南京炮兵学院
出处 《高等教育研究学报》 2011年第4期91-94,110,共5页 Journal of Higher Education Research
关键词 人文地形小组 《坎大哈人文地形报告》 人类学 我军军事教育 "human and topopographical Team" Kandahar Province Survey Report anthropology military education
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Human Terrain System--Kandahar Province Survey Report March 2010 [ DB/OL].http ://www. wired, corn/images _ blogs/dangerroom/2010/04/ kandahar - province - survey - report - 5 - apr - 2010 - for - isaf. pdf, Mar. 2011.
  • 2萨缪尔·亨廷顿.文明的冲突与世界秩序的重建[M].北京:新华出版社,2002.129.
  • 3杨孝文.美军急招人类学家上战场[J].环球军事,2007(11S):27-27. 被引量:1
  • 4Pamela R. Frese, Margaret C. Harrell. Anthropology and the United States military: Coming of Age in the Twenty - first Century. Palgrave Macmillan - Academic Publisher,2003.
  • 5David H. Price. Anthropolgical Intelligence: The Deployment and Neglect of American Anthropology in the Second World War. Duke University Press,2008.
  • 6George R. Lucas Jr. Anthropologists in Arms: The Ethics of Military Anthropology. Critical Issues in Anhropology. Critical Issues in Anthropology. AltaMira Press,2009.
  • 7John D. Kelly, Beatrice Jauregui, Scan T. Mitchell, Jeremy Walton. Anthropology and Global Counterinsurgency. The University of Chicago Press ,2010.
  • 8Roberto J. Gonzalez . American Counterinsurgency: Human Science and the Human Terrain. Prickly Paradigm Press ,2009.

共引文献6

同被引文献23

  • 1张骁.浅论文化中心战略对现代局部战争的影响[J].政工研究文摘,2006(6):44-47. 被引量:1
  • 2彼得·H·丹顿.21世纪的战争:从战场空间到战场领域[J].外国军事学术.2013(10).
  • 3曹小东.不可忽视战斗力中的文化因素[J].东南军事学术.2005(5).
  • 4关勇军,王春烽美军注重外语和外国文化教育[J].桂林空军学院学报.2009,26(3).
  • 5刘鹏.十年战争对美国陆军的影响[J].外国军事学术.2013(6).
  • 6孟莹泽人文地形测绘的特点[J].军事测绘信息.2011(3).
  • 7任珊珊.当前美国对"文化情报"的认识及对我之启示[J].军事情报研究.2009(4).
  • 8孙晔飞.文化影响战争[N].中国国防报.2007,2(1).
  • 9总政联络部.美军政治性工作研究论丛(第三辑)[M].北京:解放军出版社,2009.
  • 10孙晔飞.文化感知,你准备好了吗[J].中国空军,2008,0(2):66-67. 被引量:1

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部