期刊文献+

Failed biliary cannulation: Clinical and technical outcomes after tertiary referral endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography 被引量:6

Failed biliary cannulation: Clinical and technical outcomes after tertiary referral endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM: Prospective evaluation of repeat endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for failed Schutz grade 1 biliary cannulation in a high-volume center. METHODS: Prospective intention-to-treat analysis of patients referred for biliary cannulation following recent unsuccessful ERCP. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (35 female; mean age: 62.5 years; age range: 40-87 years) with previous failed biliary cannulation were referred for repeat ERCP. The indication for ERCP was primarily choledocholithiasis (45%) or pancreatic malignancy (18%). Successful biliary can- nulation was 100%. The precut needle knife sphincterotomy (NKS) rate was 27.4%. Complications occurred in 3.9% (post-ERCP pancreatitis). An identif iable reason for initial unsuccessful biliary cannulation was present in 55% of cases. Compared to a cohort of 940 nave pa-pilla patients (female 61%; mean age: 59.9 years; age range: 18-94 years) who required sphincterotomy over the same time period, there was no statistical difference in the cannulation success rate (100% vs 98%) or postERCP pancreatitis (3.1% vs 3.9%). Precut NKS use was more frequent (27.4% vs 12.7%) (P = 0.017). CONCLUSION: Referral to a high-volume center following unsuccessful ERCP is associated with high technical success, with a favorable complication rate, compared to routine ERCP procedures. AIM: Prospective evaluation of repeat endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for failed Schutz grade 1 biliary cannulation in a high-volume center. METHODS: Prospective intention-to-treat analysis of patients referred for biliary cannulation following recent unsuccessful ERCP. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (35 female; mean age: 62.5 years; age range: 40-87 years) with previous failed biliary cannulation were referred for repeat ERCP. The indication for ERCP was primarily choledocholithiasis (45%) or pancreatic malignancy (18%). Successful biliary can- nulation was 100%. The precut needle knife sphincterotomy (NKS) rate was 27.4%. Complications occurred in 3.9% (post-ERCP pancreatitis). An identif iable reason for initial unsuccessful biliary cannulation was present in 55% of cases. Compared to a cohort of 940 nave pa-pilla patients (female 61%; mean age: 59.9 years; age range: 18-94 years) who required sphincterotomy over the same time period, there was no statistical difference in the cannulation success rate (100% vs 98%) or postERCP pancreatitis (3.1% vs 3.9%). Precut NKS use was more frequent (27.4% vs 12.7%) (P = 0.017). CONCLUSION: Referral to a high-volume center following unsuccessful ERCP is associated with high technical success, with a favorable complication rate, compared to routine ERCP procedures.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2011年第45期4993-4998,共6页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 技术成果 造影 插管 胆管 内镜 平均年龄 临床 胆总管结石 Failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography Failed biliary cannulation Unsuccessful biliary cannulation Tertiary referral endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography Needle knife sphincterotomy Biliary cannulation Precut sphincterotomy Post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1Williams EJ, Taylor S, Fairclough P, Hamlyn A, Logan RF, Martin D, Riley SA, Veitch P, Wilkinson M, Williamson PJ, Lombard M. Are we meeting the standards set for endos- copy? Results of a large-scale prospective survey of endo- scopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatograph practice. Gut 2007; 56:821-829.
  • 2Baron TH, Petersen BT, Mergener K, Chak A, Cohen J, Deal SE, Hoffman B, Jacobson BC, Petrini JL, Safdi MA, Faigel DO, Pike IM. Quality indicators for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: S29-S34.
  • 3Schlup MM, Williams SM, Barbezat GO. ERCP: a review of technical competency and workload in a small unit. Gastro- intest Endosc 1997; 46:48-52.
  • 4Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, Chilovi F, Costan F, De Berardinis F, De Bemardin M, Ederle A, Fina P, Fratton A. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48:1-10.
  • 5Kaffes AJ, Bourke MJ, Ding S, Alrubaie A, Kwan V, Wil- liams SJ. A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of transdermal glyceryl trinitrate in ERCP: effects on technical success and post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64:351-357.
  • 6Laasch HU, Tringali A, Wilbraham L, Marriott A, England RE, Mutignani M, Perri V, Costamagna G, Martin DF. Com- parison of standard and steerable catheters for bile duct cannulation in ERCP. Endoscopy 2003; 35:669-674.
  • 7Bailey AA, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ, Walsh PR, Murray MA, Lee EY, Kwan V, Lynch PM. A prospective randomized trial of cannulation technique in ERCP: effects on technical suc- cess and post-ERCP pancreatitis. Endoscopy 2008; 40:296-301.
  • 8Conjoint committee for the recognition of training in gastro- intestinal endoscopy. Available from: URL: http: //www. conjoint.org.au/information.html (accessed 3 February 2010).
  • 9Swan MP, Bourke MJ, Alexander S, Williams SJ, Bailey AA, Hope R, Ruppin DC. A sequential cannulation protocol including early pancreatic stent placement and needle knife sphincterotomy: Interim analysis of a randomized trial. Gas- trointest Endosc 2009; 69:AB139-AB140.
  • 10Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, Geenen JE, Russell RC, Meyers WC, Liguory C, Nickl N. Endoscopic sphincter- otomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37:383-393.

同被引文献23

引证文献6

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部